Message from @Zandu

Discord ID: 642464617418719292


2019-11-08 20:39:10 UTC  

you don't need to dodge it with playing the word games "oh is it this-and-that-ism?!"

2019-11-08 20:39:29 UTC  

biblical apocryphal means in the vulgate but not the hebrew books

2019-11-08 20:39:59 UTC  

Daniel isn't in the Hebrew bible?

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/523834972126052352/642463349182824468/unknown.png

2019-11-08 20:40:07 UTC  

and my favorite word as kid, Septuagint

2019-11-08 20:40:16 UTC  

muh septuagint lmao

2019-11-08 20:40:32 UTC  

Vulgate and Septuagint, but not in the Hebrew books IIRC

2019-11-08 20:40:38 UTC  

the best meme I've heard was "greek temple scroll"

2019-11-08 20:41:27 UTC  

Daniel is in the Hebrew bible

2019-11-08 20:42:01 UTC  

therefore not apocryphal like Sophie said

2019-11-08 20:42:13 UTC  

Daniel and Ezra are weird because they are not completely in hebrew

2019-11-08 20:42:25 UTC  

what was it aramaic?

2019-11-08 20:42:43 UTC  

I thought some chunk was in aramaic but I get that mixed up\

2019-11-08 20:42:48 UTC  

some parts of those two were

2019-11-08 20:43:10 UTC  

i went to Catholic school k-12, but went to a public univ

2019-11-08 20:43:16 UTC  

primarily for the chicks, it was a mistake

2019-11-08 20:43:36 UTC  

Catholics... virtually anything Jesus said to the Pharisees could be said to them

2019-11-08 20:43:42 UTC  

I have met Catholic scholars whom that doesn't pertain to

2019-11-08 20:44:16 UTC  

I wasn't Catholic, just went to Catholic school

2019-11-08 20:44:47 UTC  

I lost my religion at 12 when I started reading Omni Magazine anyway

2019-11-08 20:44:53 UTC  

aha heh

2019-11-08 20:45:01 UTC  

sadly most religion despises the truth

2019-11-08 20:45:14 UTC  

and therefore conceptually despises Christ who is truth itself

2019-11-08 20:45:17 UTC  

the word of God is truth

2019-11-08 20:46:24 UTC  

scrolling up, daniel has portions that are considered apocryphal

2019-11-08 20:46:53 UTC  

what ,the portions that need to be considered as such because they predicted the future?

2019-11-08 20:47:07 UTC  

Well, it's part of the split between Catholicism and Protestantism as well

2019-11-08 20:47:26 UTC  

neither of them can get the basics right though

2019-11-08 20:47:38 UTC  

how can they expect to teach lawlessness and be considered anything but the lowest in the kingdom of heaven

2019-11-08 20:48:49 UTC  

It's like half of 3 chapters and 1 whole chapter something like that

2019-11-08 20:49:46 UTC  

not sure the content, one is the Manasseh one though

2019-11-08 20:50:30 UTC  

```The prayer is considered apocryphal by Jews, Catholics and Protestants. It was placed at the end of 2 Chronicles in the late 4th-century Vulgate. Over a millennium later, Martin Luther included the book in his 74-book translation of the Bible. It was part of the 1537 Matthew Bible, and the 1599 Geneva Bible. It also appears in the Apocrypha of the King James Bible and of the original 1609/1610 Douai Rheims Bible. Pope Clement VIII included the prayer in an appendix to the Vulgate stating that it should continue to be read "lest it perish entirely".```

2019-11-08 20:50:57 UTC  

neat

2019-11-08 20:51:16 UTC  

So to Orthodox it is canonical

2019-11-08 20:51:34 UTC  

everybody forgets about their stuff over here

2019-11-08 20:52:14 UTC  

to a certain degree I don't really pay attention tbh... maybe what I do isn't technically ackshually #realtheology but then what else am I supposed to call it

2019-11-08 20:53:02 UTC  

I take a claim about the God of Israel, I look at what the texts say and see if it's true or not

2019-11-08 20:53:19 UTC  

if somebody makes enough false claims they're talking about some other God 🤷 one that should be rejected

2019-11-08 22:23:57 UTC  

Lol imagine living in the Internet age and still being religious

2019-11-08 22:24:01 UTC  

It really does boggle my mind

2019-11-08 22:24:34 UTC  

You have access to everything we have known - yet you choose to put your "faith" in the tiniest sliver.

2019-11-08 22:26:14 UTC  

I genuinely don't believe that religious people should have the right to vote. First of all, it shows a fundamental lack of rational/logical thinking - which is presumably one of the main reasons we don't let children and clinically insane people vote.