Message from @Sh0t
Discord ID: 642464152371068949
Or don’t know the history well enough I guess
Idk, no word game here
Just not interesting to talk to someone who isn’t interested in answering important theological questions about the nature of Christ
Like, pretty basic stuff here for a theologin to have some view on
But as ever you’d rather go on a tangent and dodge the question than have a legitimate discussion
I’m going back to the other channel.
oh no the nature of christ is made pretty clear regardless of word games
you don't need to dodge it with playing the word games "oh is it this-and-that-ism?!"
biblical apocryphal means in the vulgate but not the hebrew books
Daniel isn't in the Hebrew bible?
and my favorite word as kid, Septuagint
muh septuagint lmao
Vulgate and Septuagint, but not in the Hebrew books IIRC
the best meme I've heard was "greek temple scroll"
Daniel is in the Hebrew bible
therefore not apocryphal like Sophie said
Daniel and Ezra are weird because they are not completely in hebrew
what was it aramaic?
I thought some chunk was in aramaic but I get that mixed up\
some parts of those two were
primarily for the chicks, it was a mistake
Catholics... virtually anything Jesus said to the Pharisees could be said to them
I have met Catholic scholars whom that doesn't pertain to
I wasn't Catholic, just went to Catholic school
I lost my religion at 12 when I started reading Omni Magazine anyway
aha heh
sadly most religion despises the truth
and therefore conceptually despises Christ who is truth itself
the word of God is truth
scrolling up, daniel has portions that are considered apocryphal
what ,the portions that need to be considered as such because they predicted the future?
Well, it's part of the split between Catholicism and Protestantism as well
neither of them can get the basics right though
how can they expect to teach lawlessness and be considered anything but the lowest in the kingdom of heaven
It's like half of 3 chapters and 1 whole chapter something like that
not sure the content, one is the Manasseh one though
```The prayer is considered apocryphal by Jews, Catholics and Protestants. It was placed at the end of 2 Chronicles in the late 4th-century Vulgate. Over a millennium later, Martin Luther included the book in his 74-book translation of the Bible. It was part of the 1537 Matthew Bible, and the 1599 Geneva Bible. It also appears in the Apocrypha of the King James Bible and of the original 1609/1610 Douai Rheims Bible. Pope Clement VIII included the prayer in an appendix to the Vulgate stating that it should continue to be read "lest it perish entirely".```
neat
So to Orthodox it is canonical
everybody forgets about their stuff over here