Not forgery, just apocryphal

not apocryphal if its in the canon

Daniel is in Ha Novi the prophets

That’s not what apocryphal means

In religious contexts

It can be apocryphal and canon

k, Daniel is part of the Tanakh regardless

Ok, you don’t know theology enough to discuss this

nah I just don't play these silly word games lol

Or don’t know the history well enough I guess

Idk, no word game here

Just not interesting to talk to someone who isn’t interested in answering important theological questions about the nature of Christ

Like, pretty basic stuff here for a theologin to have some view on

But as ever you’d rather go on a tangent and dodge the question than have a legitimate discussion

I’m going back to the other channel.

oh no the nature of christ is made pretty clear regardless of word games

you don't need to dodge it with playing the word games "oh is it this-and-that-ism?!"

biblical apocryphal means in the vulgate but not the hebrew books

Daniel isn't in the Hebrew bible?

and my favorite word as kid, Septuagint

muh septuagint lmao

Vulgate and Septuagint, but not in the Hebrew books IIRC

the best meme I've heard was "greek temple scroll"

Daniel is in the Hebrew bible

therefore not apocryphal like Sophie said

Daniel and Ezra are weird because they are not completely in hebrew

what was it aramaic?

I thought some chunk was in aramaic but I get that mixed up\

some parts of those two were

i went to Catholic school k-12, but went to a public univ

primarily for the chicks, it was a mistake

Catholics... virtually anything Jesus said to the Pharisees could be said to them

I have met Catholic scholars whom that doesn't pertain to

I wasn't Catholic, just went to Catholic school

I lost my religion at 12 when I started reading Omni Magazine anyway

aha heh

sadly most religion despises the truth

and therefore conceptually despises Christ who is truth itself

the word of God is truth

scrolling up, daniel has portions that are considered apocryphal

what ,the portions that need to be considered as such because they predicted the future?