What’s an example of a dead wrong axiom

The psalms are not in the tanakh

Er worry

... yes they are

*sorry, meant Torah

Tanach is Torah (Pentateuch) and Ha Novi (the prophets)

The Tanakh has been changed

The apocalypse of Abraham, for instance, is not in the tanakh

That was a political decision

well no it's pretty identical to the dead sea scrolls

and yeah we have different canons like the book of Maccabees

not in Tanakh

Is Alexander the Great mentioned in any Abrahamic texts?

No I don’t believe so

Daniel predicts some pretty important figures in history

I think that's why people conclude it must have been a forgery

Yeah, because Daniel was written quite late

Not forgery, just apocryphal

not apocryphal if its in the canon

Daniel is in Ha Novi the prophets

That’s not what apocryphal means

In religious contexts

It can be apocryphal and canon

k, Daniel is part of the Tanakh regardless

Ok, you don’t know theology enough to discuss this

nah I just don't play these silly word games lol

Or don’t know the history well enough I guess

Idk, no word game here

Just not interesting to talk to someone who isn’t interested in answering important theological questions about the nature of Christ

Like, pretty basic stuff here for a theologin to have some view on

But as ever you’d rather go on a tangent and dodge the question than have a legitimate discussion

I’m going back to the other channel.

oh no the nature of christ is made pretty clear regardless of word games

you don't need to dodge it with playing the word games "oh is it this-and-that-ism?!"

biblical apocryphal means in the vulgate but not the hebrew books

Daniel isn't in the Hebrew bible?

and my favorite word as kid, Septuagint

muh septuagint lmao

Vulgate and Septuagint, but not in the Hebrew books IIRC

the best meme I've heard was "greek temple scroll"

Daniel is in the Hebrew bible