There are times where people have to start having kids.
My point is that the baby is not your life and so you have no right to end it.
What
Once it has a heartbeat, which occurs at 6 weeks, it is no longer your life
the baby is intruding on your body, making any means necessary to defend yourself justified
No
If the baby is alive and a person than it should have legal rights correct?
Why do fetuses have more value than say a cow, then?
They don't
I would agree that if it’s going to harm someone, yes. It should be aborted. But not if everything will go ok
A cow actually does shit
the thing is
the baby always harms the mother
@Brigadier Genral Headass If the baby is alive and a person than it should have legal rights correct?
in every single case there is harm coming to the mother
Elton John, yes
Then legally the child doesn't own the women's body does it
?
I was referring to the eailer question
My guy
@Deleted User you probably just found a loophole in the law
good job
The woman is simply denying the child the right to use her body
If the baby is alive
It has rights
Yes
GG @Brigadier Genral Headass, you just advanced to level 2!
It does
i dont follow that notion
it only has rights when it is a person
Then the argument that the child is alive so its wrong to kill it is invade
Legally
May I ask if your American detective?
no
It doesn't own the women's body
Therefore
You arnt american?
Boom
