I was referring to the eailer question
My guy
@Deleted User you probably just found a loophole in the law
good job
The woman is simply denying the child the right to use her body
If the baby is alive
It has rights
Yes
GG @Brigadier Genral Headass, you just advanced to level 2!
It does
i dont follow that notion
it only has rights when it is a person
Then the argument that the child is alive so its wrong to kill it is invade
Legally
May I ask if your American detective?
no
It doesn't own the women's body
Therefore
You arnt american?
Boom
Now
Щнеге ще dяорiлg ьоis
im not
GG @DetectiveFatWeedington, you just advanced to level 2!
Ok, that’s where I can’t debate you
My ideas center around the constitution
why
well my ideas center around the philosophical implications
Oof
Pepole say anarchy is bad
I disagree
Explain
🆙 | **LOGIC BAD leveled up!**
A world where we just do lsd and listen to elton John collectively is a good one
I LIKES Lsd
Same
But anarchy is really bad
It's so hard to buy though
Not at my school
