?

I was referring to the eailer question

My guy

@Deleted User you probably just found a loophole in the law

good job

The woman is simply denying the child the right to use her body

If the baby is alive

It has rights

Yes

GG @Brigadier Genral Headass, you just advanced to level 2!

It does

i dont follow that notion

it only has rights when it is a person

Then the argument that the child is alive so its wrong to kill it is invade

Legally

May I ask if your American detective?

no

It doesn't own the women's body

Therefore

You arnt american?

The woman is simply denying the child the right to use her body

Boom

Now

Щнеге ще dяорiлg ьоis

im not

GG @DetectiveFatWeedington, you just advanced to level 2!

Ok, that’s where I can’t debate you

My ideas center around the constitution

why

well my ideas center around the philosophical implications

Oof

Pepole say anarchy is bad

I disagree

Explain

🆙 | **LOGIC BAD leveled up!**

A world where we just do lsd and listen to elton John collectively is a good one

I LIKES Lsd

Same

But anarchy is really bad

It's so hard to buy though