War is good for business

Peace is good for business

as well

At least this incel has the right idea.

nou

and all of these rules were set in place by the rich to create longer wars

Do not lecture me on what the rich do and do not.

The poor have always stood up to the rich in varying degrees of success.

but in a war were the rich need to fight for survival things will be a lot different

The rich however provides its opium.

The rich tames the poor with its opium.

The rich use religion as institutions to distribute these opium.

But some have backed away from religion.

The rich then uses academia to distribute the same opium that religion distributes.

But let go of the opium.

Forget what religion has told you.

Forget what science has told you.

And you'll find that there is nothing dividing the poor and the rich aside from the chains that you have voluntarily allowed yourself into.

Point..?

@Techpriest was the union of Soviet SOCIALIST republics communist or socialist did the DPRK have communism in its constitution or SOCIALISM, Cuba is run by a communist party but it has a SOCIALIST economy. What you’re saying makes no sense according to Marxism. Socialism as stated before is a workers state Socialism is worker ownership of the means of production, the abolition of private property and commodity production. A state with only proletarians and no bourgeois (there is no such compromise between classes as in capitalism) It is the translational phase from capitalism to communism. Communism is a stateless, classless, moneyless society which will happen after socialism has achieved a global victory over the imperialist powers. If you want to get rid of the state immediately you are an anarchist and thereby anti Marxist, if you are just pretending that socialism is social democracy and communism is socialism then you are doing the left as a whole a great disservice and feeding into bourgeois lies

Karl Marx viewed history through what is known as dialectical materialism, greatly oversimplified dialectical materialism states that the material conditions for slavery is what caused feudalism to rise as a response to the issues in slavery, as were the material conditions for fuedalism such that capitalism would arise as a response to the issues in feudalism, the internal contradictions within the capitalist mode of production would then give way to a new society that being a workers state, socialism and that would eventually give way into communism which is stateless. Marx heavily disagreed with anarchists in that we could immediately go from capitalism into statelessness and thereby kicked them out of the 1st internationale. Honestly knowing the difference between socialism and communism is pretty basic stuff, to be anti socialist as a marxist is an oxymoron because he uses the two words interchangeably in his writings (though my aforementioned statement about him wanting a transitional state into statelessness is true regardless of semantics)

Damn commies fighting commies

Nice

Marxist essays

https://tenor.com/view/popcorn-dance-wwe-newday-big-e-gif-9856188

Extermination, good thing?

I disagree

-df socialism

**socialism**: Actual: An [economic system] in between capitalism and communism, advocating collective ownership of [the means] of production and distribution of goods.

Slang: Anything that a [right winger] doesn't like.
*The national highway system is an example of socialism.

That atheist socialist [Hussein] wants to [impose] [Sharia Law] and gay marriage on America!*
*(<http://socialism.urbanup.com/6417987>)* *9 more results*

Definition here says nothing about your definitions at all

-df communism

**Communism**: Communism is a socioeconomic structure and political ideology that promotes the establishment of an [egalitarian], [classless], [stateless] society based on common ownership and control of the means of production and property in general.
*"The theory of Communism may be summed up in one sentence: [Abolish] all [private property]." - [Karl Marx]*
*(<http://communism.urbanup.com/4368440>)* *9 more results*

Communism does however

And the bot knows more than your "definition"

@Techpriest look at the definitions I’m right, socialism is a transition phase in between capitalism and communism that has common ownership over the means of production and distributive goods, communism is a classless, stateless society that also has common control over the means of production and private property.

Yall hear about Walmart losing $1BN over E-Commerce against Amazon

Fuck Walmart

did u hear amazon

GG @Techpriest, you just advanced to level 35!

got btfo by china

Lol