Message from @Sh0t

Discord ID: 645821718497198101


2019-11-18 02:58:48 UTC  

I knew that was not going to happen based on his advisors

2019-11-18 02:59:14 UTC  

McMullin wasn't any better there, but at least he wouldn't be a foreign operative, something I suspected about Clinton and Trump

2019-11-18 02:59:55 UTC  

This reads like a Tom Clancy novel

2019-11-18 03:00:00 UTC  

Taleb misjudged Trump on one of the most important tail risks he cares about, the environment

2019-11-18 03:00:15 UTC  

I dont see how corporate and upper class tax cuts de leverage institutions large enough to need social bail outs (his whole point in antifragile, black swan and his most recent book)

2019-11-18 03:00:25 UTC  

He didnt misjudge trump, he ignored that tail risk

2019-11-18 03:01:23 UTC  

I can't quite parse that

2019-11-18 03:01:34 UTC  

Additionally please explain how pro corporate actions in the part of the FTC, just to name one trump stacked agency, lead to derisked institutions. The support of hegemony and monopoly seems counter to everything taleb said

2019-11-18 03:02:12 UTC  

Trump has only one real legislative achievement and has done nothing economically but cut taxes and deregulate corporations

2019-11-18 03:02:12 UTC  

Trump hasn't done anything on that front, things are worse and probably getter worser fasterer

2019-11-18 03:02:21 UTC  

Getter worser

2019-11-18 03:02:26 UTC  

Okay we are done here :)

2019-11-18 03:02:58 UTC  

Trump hasnt cut taxes is a bold stance

2019-11-18 03:03:16 UTC  

As is claiming he hasnt deregulated industries

2019-11-18 03:03:17 UTC  

Nice try

2019-11-18 03:03:18 UTC  

There was a tax cut for some, a tax raise for others

2019-11-18 03:03:26 UTC  

SALT deduction change was a tax raise on some

2019-11-18 03:04:16 UTC  

Doubly, the pressure on the fed to lower rates puts us in a situation where recession mandates fiscal, as opposed to monetary policy. Essentially mandating corporate bail outs

2019-11-18 03:04:22 UTC  

Fuck taleb and fuck trump

2019-11-18 03:04:30 UTC  

I'm not a fan of the Trump policies so I can't really explain why they were taken, but I suppose they could argue the corporate tax repatriation could have been used to pay off some debt, but I haven't seen numbers on those effects beyond the lack of wage growth

2019-11-18 03:04:56 UTC  

Fiscal policy is a given, no matter what the Fed does

2019-11-18 03:05:00 UTC  

Repatriation =/= taxable

2019-11-18 03:05:05 UTC  

That's the point if repatriation

2019-11-18 03:05:11 UTC  

That why it was not repatriated

2019-11-18 03:05:19 UTC  

Cool beans though

2019-11-18 03:07:30 UTC  

Part of Trump's explanation for the TCJA was to encourage overseas held corporate money to come back, hence the reduction to 21%

2019-11-18 03:12:40 UTC  

```Before the new tax law, companies kept much of their overseas profit offshore to avoid a 35% tax that kicked in when they brought the money back to the U.S. The Republican tax law set a one-time 15.5% tax rate on cash and 8% on non-cash or illiquid assets, regardless of where the profits sat.```

2019-11-18 03:12:44 UTC  

```Corporations brought $100.2 billion of overseas profits back to the U.S. in the first quarter, marking $876.8 billion that has returned since Congress overhauled the international tax system and prodded companies to repatriate more.

The cash that has come back to the U.S. falls short of the $4 trillion President Donald Trump said would return as a result of the 2017 tax law. Investment banks and think tanks have estimated that U.S. corporations actually held $1.5 trillion to $2.5 trillion in offshore funds at the time the law was enacted.```

2019-11-18 03:13:08 UTC  

Not as much as promised, but some of that is repatriation

2019-11-18 03:18:20 UTC  

it didn't translate to much wage growth, it mostly went to buybacks, so it was a silly gimmick to pump the stock market if anything

2019-11-18 03:24:06 UTC  

So Taleb applauds Trump for trying to avoid war with Iran. I think destroying the nuclear deal with Iran was on the right path to that anyway so 2 steps back, 1 step forward on that one

2019-11-18 19:26:58 UTC  

@AlphaUK to understand what I said about the Euro and immigration, read this prediction of what problems the EuroZone would have in 1992, particlarly the last paragraph:
https://www.lrb.co.uk/v14/n19/wynne-godley/maastricht-and-all-that

2019-11-18 19:29:33 UTC  

1992?

2019-11-18 19:36:06 UTC  

I didn't read all of it because it was hurting my brain a little bit but the last paragraph was pretty interesting

2019-11-18 19:41:24 UTC  

yea he predicted what would happen

2019-11-19 01:04:26 UTC  
2019-11-19 20:08:17 UTC  

> The 2003 North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) deregulated all agricultural trade, except for corn and dairy products. The Mexican government complains that since NAFTA’s initial implementation in 1994, the United States has raised farm subsidies by 300 percent. As a result, Mexican corn farmers, who comprise the majority of the country’s agricultural sector, experienced drastic declines in the domestic price of their product. It should come as no surprise, then, that the United States began to experience an influx of Mexicans looking for employment in the latter half of the 1990s.

2019-11-19 20:08:30 UTC  

> “An Ethnographic Study of the Social Context of Migrant Health in the United States.” In the study we learn that 95 percent of agricultural workers in the United States were born in Mexico and 52 percent are undocumented.

2019-11-19 20:11:51 UTC  

> Out of all the crops that farmers grow, the government only subsidizes five of them. They are corn, soybeans, wheat, cotton, and rice.
> Corn is the nation's biggest crop. Over 15 billion bushels were grown in 2017, with 15% exported. The corn belt is Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, Missouri, Nebraska, and Kansas. A third of Iowa's economy depends on farming. California produces the most food by value. Most of it is almonds, wine, dairy, walnuts, and pistachios. These aren't subsidized.

2019-11-20 00:05:07 UTC