@spursfan82 - they were protesting against the election results ... in the pic I 'shotted. I also have no idea about antifa's and commies and all the rest of that jazz - my eye is really on the SA ball as that's where my concern/interest lies. My point really is police brutality is unacceptable - anywhere. Why would you need a shield against the POLICE? Better ways to stop a protest surely? And certainly I cant think of a single reason to call it "beautiful" or to repetitively express violence as a means of making someone more intelligent as is suggested above?

Not a fan of police brutality either.
But also not a fan of protesting election results, unless they were a fraud.
Basically, they just throwing a tantrum because they lost right?

@Deleted User must be nice living in a world where violence isn't the answer. Unfortunately the only way to fix things is with violence

Those guys who raped and murdered that girl in Stellenbosch? They shouldn't be in court, they should be in a ditch with holes in their head

That goes for any murderer or rapist. Enough with wasting tax money on people who won't learn

Just remember. Lindsay Maasdorp supports those Stellenbosch rapists.

Then he gets to burn in a tyre too

Enough talk

@Cal bearing your warped thought pattern in mind, I'm assuming you are one of the few of your kind then who do not view Mandela as a terrorist - I mean violence and bombing is the answer isnt it? Why then the issue with this? .

He is a terrorist though

No point hiding that, one man's terrorist is another's freedom fighter

@Cal how come? Whats wrong with violence .... you just said its the answer? do explain .......

Anyone fighting against the established government is a terrorist

I'm not saying there's anything wrong either

"Warped thought pattern" 😆 That's pretty harsh...

@spursfan82 , not really - in fact I think its, whats the word Im looking for ..... oh, yes: "beautiful"!

You wanna see something beautiful?
My brazillian friend might like this

@Deleted User it has taken me a long time to type this because I wanted to make sure my english was okay to avoid misunderstandings. you are confusing your personal opinion and view of events with reality. you are trying to speak of things you have no idea of, and you follow that by comparing it with things that are in no way comparable. I said that violent idiots were attacked by people because the criminals in questions were rioting around peoples homes and businesses, throwing bricks and rocks at buildings and people. I do despise those people causing the trouble, but I am not celebrating them being attacked in turn, as satisfying as it is to see. I am celebrating that peaceful people stood against violent communist hooligans to defend their homes and their families. No I am not confused, you can be peaceful and still have the right to fight back. It is truly disgusting how you defend such people. every video i have seen since yesterday of so called police brutality, the police never start it. if someone gets pepper sprayed at a protest, I am not happy about that, but if someone gets pepper sprayed and beaten up because they threw petrol bomb at police, I am not stupid enough to defend or sympathize them. You are not an ANC supporter I am sure, but would you go and throw petrol bombs at police when the ANC wins an election? would you support them? would you criticize police for arresting you or your friends who threw petrol bombs at them? would you defend someone who comes into your street at night and throws a rock through your childrens window?

I ask you to not judge others from your place of privilege, I do not know your situation either so maybe I am wrong about you, but I think you should think more about why you support violent hooligans who have already murdered dozens of innocent civilians in just days because their preferred candidate, who is a criminal himself mind you, lost fairly in a democratic election. you are witnessing democracy as Pericles himself intended. As to why I am on a south african server. This is because I watch renaldo and I enjoy his content, does any of the rules say that only south africans may be here? you hold no more power over this server than I do so why are you here trying to dictate who may or may not be here based on their political views and opinions. Brazil as a country suffers ten times worse than what you just listed for south africa, but we dont spend our time trying to censor people we dont like on discord

one of my all time favourite beautiful moments:


https://youtu.be/jytIS6BHFwQ

One of my favourites

Why would you grab a cops tazer and not expect to get shot by 2 armed cops lol

to be honest i think the shooting was a bit extreme - they could've stopped at tazering him.

He didn't go down the first time

I'm not sure what they were supposed to do

I dunno, the cop already warned him about being tazed just before he grabbed the cops tazer, and while being tazed he still decided to point it at the cop who shot him. I get the impression that he still would have fired off that tazer, and the first cop no longer had a tazer on him, so what were they going to do really to improve the situation?

Besides, can hear he is still alive, so they only shot to disarm him, not to kill him.

@GTollini don't recall mentioning your name specifically - but if the jackboot fits, wear it - try not to kick anyone though (hard for you as that may be) . Also, pray tell, what IS my "position of privilege" and since when is challenging an opinion censorship? Actually, spare yourself the time of crafting an explanation, I really don't care: "but I think you should think more about why you support violent hooligans who have already murdered dozens of innocent civilians in just days".

I don't understand why you protect Communists, you realize they would do the same?

Who are we talking about?

Dust-E

When we live under a set of laws, we are bound by those laws, and we are supposed use the laws legal process to overcome the issues. If the people resort to violent behavior that trigger law enforcement (and please realise the emphasis on "enforcement") its because the law itself approves to deal with a threat by whatever means, a violent threat does warrant a violent response.

Even if the government is corrupt, that's not an excuse to abandon the law and go against it, that only justifies the corrupt governments use of force. Now why would anyone want to justify that? Supposed to lead the good example of the law, not follow a bad one.

GG @Sheamus, you just advanced to level 26!

@dostoevskysghost Don't suppose you have videos of naxalites getting beaten?

@Cal umm not on my phone no.