Message from @Sheamus
Discord ID: 506891942790037504
Also trying to work that out @Jub
just read through the logs xP
idk u guyys keep fighting
@GTollini anyone is allowed here so dw
have a nice day
@GTollini 😂🙃☝️😒🙄
Some Right Wing people has become like the Left finding offence in something that is not offensive. Change My Mind.
Who is most likely to swallow
Me
Or
You
Fair enough
Got to get in that extra protein.
yikes
Essential Vitamins and Minerals
You need the sauce. But you can also get lost in the sauce.
They aren't fighting, they are just disagreeing. It's still pretty civil to be considered a fight really.
Nothing wrong with disagreements, it's also to be expected here honestly.
discord definition: 1. disagreement between people.
You're on the money @literally 😊 .... nothing like a little bit of an opinion skop skit n donder between online avatar shields. Best part? Nothing but feelings (if even those) get hurt 😎
Yeah I rate that's better as opposed to alternative 🙁 feelings are temporary. I prefer the disagreement and the conversations, so keep it civil and majority should be okay with it.
@spursfan82 was talking about the conspiracy theory that modern day Jews are actually converted kulaks
@SebVet Lol.. what?
No, I was referring to that post about Boers being "modern day Jews" - I disagreed and said it would be more accurate to compare boers to the kulaks.
Yea got confused. Usually when Jews and Kulaks are in the same paragraph that’s what someone talking about. There was ambiguity in the sentence
@Duke lol the question was basically yes/no wether to carry on with apartheid are you fucking kidding me. Of course it’s racist to say yes, I want apartheid to continue. Maybe if you’re insane and believe apartheid wasn’t racist.
Also not everyone that’s against Bolsonaro is a communist. According to him Everyone whose against bolsanaro is a communist
hmm
So guys
Loaded questions are typical though😕
@SebVet Why are you going on reddit for news
But @GTollini I may actually think Bolsonaro is what Brazil needs. I think a lot of his rhetoric may have been electioneering but you need a major crackdown on crime. Isn’t it like 1/3 of Brazilians have been in the middle of a gunfight.
I'm disgusted
@WuldGoGayForLauren it’s quite a good news aggregator
@SebVet dont you think that rhetoric is dangerous though? I mean if I compare this to Malema - he says its rhetoric and he doesn't really mean *actually* slitting the throats of whiteness, he doesn't really mean kill the boer, yet every time he goes off on a tangent, farmers die? That crime is bad in Brazil is undeniable, that it needs sorting is a given, but people in power, or seeking power need to be careful of what they say - lets remember that their supporters lap their shit up, and act it out ..... words do matter - and leaders should really be cognisant of that. Its also what gets me about Trump - he incites - people follow through. Its why I cant reconcile fighting off violence with violence , or celebrating violence when you have been affected by it .... Lula is a shit, he's driven the crowds to Bolsonaro - who isnt (in my uneducated opinion) the exilir - he's just a different kind of poison in an enticing bottle.
That said 55% is not a slim margin ....... thats a lot of people who buy into and espouse his opinions.
@Deleted User usually I’m all for the politics of moderation, especially in this country. But when gangs are walking around Favelas with Fully Automatic weapons and the country was rocked A) by a recession B) an enormous corruption scandal I can’t really justify supporting Hadad over Bolsenaro. The Racism and anti - LGBT stuff I think most likely(hopefully) won’t go anywhere and he’s said that he’s not against the democracy. So it’s probably worth it to have an authoritarian to restore order
