Message from @WuldGoGayForLauren
Discord ID: 507252769074315265
no i'm all for public convo's as long as its not repeating the same thing over and over because ppl cant scroll up
Yeah we can.
@Nidalap Rorrim u seem annoyed xd
Which once again I wouldn't blame u this chat gets cancer sometimes
wtf
I didn't delete anything
Im not kaaplander
I think it basically just boils down to me not agreeing with @Sheamus that the majority is calling for a revolution
@lekker man not u
Titus
I was responding to your question
opinions can differ so lets leave it at that
@Nidalap Rorrim How was ur day
;>
PostiveVibes
Literally when are you gonna join us in vc?
Perception differs, ideas differ, opinions differ. Have to sit down and reason about it, disagreement is fine, so long as its civil.
hehe ja you can do that
I dunno, if I go on voice I have other groups where I go into voice, that's why I don't hang around in voice here lol
@Nidalap Rorrim let's do ... after Renaldo's stream. I think there's a good discussion here and probs a lot more sensible than typing out. Hard to gauge tone. You in @literally? And why not join here. Most convos are quite chilled ...
I love vc @WuldGoGayForLauren
hm
Usually ends up in a discussion about furries
I hate it
@Apollo must smash that mute button!
Is not that I have anything against you guys that I don't want to chat here lol, I'll maybe check it out sometime, listen in and if I feel the need to add my 2c I'll do so.
Yeah that furry shite is rather annoying to be honest. There are dedicated groups and communities for that shit, dunno why it keeps crawling into every space it can.
If it's not about furries it's about Peppermint's boyfriend...
It's honestly a shithole
Lol
⎝⎠ ╲╱╲╱ ⎝⎠
Come to think of it, a good comparison to give perspective of what I mean to be the issue regarding the "majority", remember that video Renaldo did on the lady that got choked and robbed on public and broad daylight while the people all around didn't even react to it, just pretended like nothing is happening, and even laughing at it. You certainly can say that the majority there didn't Rob her, it was the fringe minority there that did, but if the majority isn't responding to it at all, it makes them complicit doesn't it? In principle, it's the same thing, that's what I'm hitting on. Different context, but same principle.
if someone is a problem in voice chat or constantly derails conversations we will remove him/mute him, because I get that certain people chase away other from talking in voice chat
I agree with what your saying. But my issue is that completely loses its context if you compress all that and just say the "majority" wants something in one short sentence.
The majority discussion came from when we were discussing your opinion that a group are pushing for a revolution
Yeah but the context really isn't the driving force behind a point, it's the principle. So to me if someone isn't actively making an effort to respond appropriately to a situation by good reason, as they would like to others to respond to them in that situation, then it only informs me that they agree with what's going on. That's complicit to me, and others seem to agree with that too. So majority is what it is, this is after all what majority rule is, majority dictates what reality is.
are you saying the ANC are pushing it or did you mean the little groups like EFF and BLF
Yes and the reality is that the revolution as they dictate it, is happening in reality... By who's will is it happening?
I'm saying the majority as in everyone all together, the majority of that. Not a specific party, race, gender, sexuality or anything.
nope don't see that happening. Humans are way to chaotic for a organized act as a revolution on the scale your talking about.