To be fair a range that was going to be hosting a bunch of noguns neophytes shooting MGs for the first time would be wise to want cash on the barrelhead, given the possibility of an accident.

I have an anecdote about this kind of thing but in typing it out i realized how unbelievable it is. Let me just say that the army can do some stupid shit sometimes when they want PR points.

**Forgotten Weapons** Uploaded a new youtube video!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsvA0UkdRuw

they stopped them from sharing the files

https://defcad.com/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2018/07/31/in-last-minute-lawsuit-states-say-3-d-printable-guns-pose-national-security-threat/?utm_term=.6070e9670c48

http://codeisfreespeech.com/

The internet doesn't forget stuff like this, don't you worry

Has the Ninth Circuit reached 90% overturned yet? Or is it still in the 80% range?

@propyne im not , i agree it is free speech

Dude seriously though streissand effect

**Forgotten Weapons** Uploaded a new youtube video!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPq1WweDIK0

This gun is a crime against armament.

https://youtu.be/-c0jzumV9iE?t=42

thoughts? Justified? unjustified?

"blocking the Trump administration from allowing the distribution of materials to easily 3-D print guns"

wat

i was unaware i needed government permission to share things in the first place. I mean, if it needs government permission and they are trying to block it

🤔 what materials would those be? 3d printers?

literally like cad files

yeah, just make the posting to the internet of cad files pertaining to gun creation illegal, that'll make them cease to exist

they want to block sharing of literal computer models of guns.

just like making CP illegal ma-**oh wait**

they attempted to do just that, but a recent court hearing ordered the previous ruling overturned

and the state had to pay back some of the legal fees

it would be a pretty ridiculous thing to do

they tried to block it on some laws pertaining to distributing arms to foreign countries

governments gotta protect it business model somehow ya know.

don't most countries militaries buy their guns from other countries

yelling -----> pushing -----> shooting

That escalated very quickly.

Over a parking spot.

The guy's not going to jail, but will there be any kind of intervention?

Imagine.

Like in the future with amazing fabrication tech, people can fabricate anything.

i'm questioning if the guy should go to jail.

everything up until the last second before he pulled the trigger justified it. But in that last second, the attacker was backing away, and the man had space.

coupled with the fact he was the original instigator

i think the attacker was no longer a threat once the gun was up because he clearly backed off. and with plenty of time for the guy on the ground to realize it. as the dude also was turning away at the time of firing.

Yeah, I don't see how he was a threat if he was backing away.

I mean what is defiend as a threat is subjective

Sounds like this guy routinely harasses people who are parked in handicapped spaces.