Message from @Atago
Discord ID: 525097086165975046
I think they'll win, the action on bump stocks declares them as machine guns, meaning more than one round is fired with a single pull of the trigger
That's not true
I wonder what ould happen if it went to SCOTUS
That shit's not gonna stand
wonder if it'll affect the machine gun ban
In the best timeline the hughes amendment would be found unconstitutional
Ban BumpStocks
legalize full auto
problem solved
Repeal the hughes amendment, ban the production of bump stocks and binary triggers
Legal machine guns have been used in 2 murders since 1934 as far as i know, and the hughes amendment was passed in 1986
**Forgotten Weapons** Uploaded a new youtube video!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21qZpSJp5W0
I swear, if this bump stock ban ends up getting repealed by the courts, but the moderate idiots who don't understand guns think well of Trump for trying...I'm almost getting tired of these nth dimensional chess moves.
Yeah, that wasn't the best thing from Trump.
On the other hand he only threw a rather worthless bone. But does that make anything better?
Especially in face of Jerry Miculek for example.
Please ignore the old man, MAC has been bump firing all the firearms he has been testing for over a year now.
Yeah, doesn't that work without a bump stock??
But the Bumpstock makes it actually easier?
And isn't bumpfiring just "4 phun" but really useless in reality?
because accuracy like 2h or so
The only practical use for Bump Fire is to troll your range and get everyone to hate you.
Yeah, exactly....
as you probably won't hit a full man size wooden target like 10m in front of you....
or like 2/10 shots or something like that
They have tested this.
Yeah I remember seeing a video about that. but don't remember much of it.
and people like Jerry M. shoot at full auto rate without any help
Someone needs to take the NY safe act to the Supreme Court as well
Stossel has a great ‘stache too
The bump stock ban is not "4d chess", i'm sure trump actually wants them banned but he won't be able to ban them through executive power unless the courts fuck up badly
It would certainly be reasonable for him to actually want it, given his background.
The problem comes to the slippery slope of legislating what we think people need or don't need....