Message from @Bookworm
Discord ID: 525167270922551296
ar320 concept using the sig p320 chassis
I swear, if this bump stock ban ends up getting repealed by the courts, but the moderate idiots who don't understand guns think well of Trump for trying...I'm almost getting tired of these nth dimensional chess moves.
Yeah, that wasn't the best thing from Trump.
On the other hand he only threw a rather worthless bone. But does that make anything better?
Especially in face of Jerry Miculek for example.
Please ignore the old man, MAC has been bump firing all the firearms he has been testing for over a year now.
Yeah, doesn't that work without a bump stock??
But the Bumpstock makes it actually easier?
And isn't bumpfiring just "4 phun" but really useless in reality?
because accuracy like 2h or so
The only practical use for Bump Fire is to troll your range and get everyone to hate you.
Yeah, exactly....
as you probably won't hit a full man size wooden target like 10m in front of you....
or like 2/10 shots or something like that
They have tested this.
Yeah I remember seeing a video about that. but don't remember much of it.
and people like Jerry M. shoot at full auto rate without any help
Someone needs to take the NY safe act to the Supreme Court as well
Stossel has a great ‘stache too
The bump stock ban is not "4d chess", i'm sure trump actually wants them banned but he won't be able to ban them through executive power unless the courts fuck up badly
The problem comes to the slippery slope of legislating what we think people need or don't need....
no one NEEDS a nuke.... but for self defense you're going to need more than a musket in this day and age
setting precedents for "trivial" things such as X size magazines, bump stocks, and other accessories allows lawmakers to say "why not ban something else?" till eventually we end up in the same situation as the UK...
Place where you can't even own a broken broom handle
Recreational Nukes Now.
You can't own nukes because you'd inadvertently hurt someone due to radiation... Guns are a point and shoot deal.... nukes... quite the opposite....
(You can still enjoy them in Fallout 4)
(because 76 is shit)
Funny, I don't recall the Second Amendment saying "The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, unless it might be hazardous to keep them if improperly maintained."
Life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.... Radiation fallout can end lives or make them miserable.... bullets hitting paper targets don't have that side effect
The same as a bullet to the ol' brainpan.
And yet, people are still allowed to have guns, because there are no caveats in the Second Amendment.
No ifs, ands, or buts.
provided you don't kill anyone
or hurt them
(emotionally doesn't count)
I'm pretty sure there are plenty of instances where you're allowed to kill people with guns.
I hazard to guess that that's the primary reason we're allowed to have them.