Message from @micamike45
Discord ID: 504505140842332161
That first part is eerily familiar
What he says to that white girl
only thing he said intelligent was knowing that black votes were for white liberals
This gives me a little bit of hope
If even Malcom X can eventually become less racist, maybe the left can, too
wow its almost like
malcom x wasnt for an ethnostate after all
This part is because he apparently changed his mind late in life
maybe pointless tribalism is worthless
and american exceptionalism is where it's at
So, I'll just come back to say that you seem to think that I was arguing for an ethnostate and I definitely wasn't. Just because DNA is different doesn't mean it's what countries should be based on.
Isn't that his point entirely?
All DNA is really different, ergo organizing society on it is foolish?
IDK, I'm not completely sure we actually disagreed
TBH I think e.g. Richard Spencer would resolve the mixed-race thing by just saying that cross-race breeding is a capital offense or something
Like, in a world carved up into ethno-states.
That seems pretty extreme.
As far as I can tell, he doesn't really have a theory of anything like rights
It seems more about survival/propagation
I mean, the whole Hispanic "race" is just mixed native/European
He might think they can have their own state or something, but that would get real complicated real fast
Yep.
Richard Spencer makes not sense to me
I dunno, just doesn't seem like the most stable basis for national foundations.
Just carve out a geographical area and form a distinct culture like all the other prosperous modern nations.
I'm sure he'd then argue that race and culture are inextricably linked, and that's another hour of my time gone.
Thanks, hypothetical Richard Spencer. I could have used that hypothetical hour.
He seems pretty intelligent to me, but also very wrong
I was very disappointed in the debate with him and Sargon and a few other folks
My understanding was that it wasn't very productive, yes.
They pretty much just called him names and never really addressed the substance of his point
Which kinda made him look like the smarter one
And he probably actually is, to be honest
But his particular points weren't even...that hard to answer
It just kinda felt like Sargon and friends had never really considered that e.g. people in power have a degree of impunity that regular citizens don't enjoy, generally speaking
Spencer understood that
He just seemed to not think it's bad per se, or not be in the hands of the right people, or something
I never actually got to know where he was going with that, because everyone just got flustered and just rejected that outright for some reason
I sometimes think I should familiarize myself more with Spencer's thought, as a "know-thy-enemy" exercise, but understanding the people that pose _serious_ threats drains me enough as it is
Yeah, it's pretty clear that Richard Spencer's movement is not going anywhere in the near future.
That's the biggest thing about the Spooky Alt-Right