Message from @I AM ERROR

Discord ID: 417305826454405130


2018-02-25 12:56:04 UTC  

deller, that example is not affirmative action ๐Ÿ˜‰

2018-02-25 12:56:29 UTC  

No, but itโ€™s positive discrimination

2018-02-25 12:56:39 UTC  

There is no positive affirmative action

2018-02-25 12:56:44 UTC  

but i could construe the negative effect of it if you want me to ๐Ÿ˜„

2018-02-25 12:56:58 UTC  

Affirmative action just sucks

2018-02-25 12:57:03 UTC  

yip

2018-02-25 12:57:14 UTC  

on every level

2018-02-25 12:57:18 UTC  

And should have disappeared 30+ years ago

2018-02-25 12:58:04 UTC  

pushing people into positions they are not qualified for never helps anyone

2018-02-25 12:58:29 UTC  

and if they are qualified they do not need affirmative action to begin with

2018-02-25 12:58:41 UTC  

It was necessary in to help out the generations devastated by Jim Crow, but Jim Crow laws havenโ€™t existed in over 50 years

2018-02-25 12:59:13 UTC  

it was the wrong way to go even then.

2018-02-25 12:59:17 UTC  

Thereโ€™s literally no justification for keeping this shit

2018-02-25 13:00:07 UTC  

don't hire unqualified people, turn them into qualified people and then hire them based on their qualifications

2018-02-25 13:01:25 UTC  

might be more expensive in the short run but will end up with a working system in the forseeable future... affirmative action ensures that you will have unqualified people forever

2018-02-25 13:02:11 UTC  

I agree, affirmative action was always a shit solution. I like to compare it to a gun shot. Black America was shot repeatedly by the Government. The government then realized they were in the wrong and decided know what, weโ€™re sorry, let me help you. Then they went to the bleeding black guy and handed him a Band-aid called affirmative action. The band-aid doesnโ€™t actually make the bullet wound go away, & barely stops the bleeding. All it does is cover up the wound so nobody has to look at it anymore.

2018-02-25 13:03:01 UTC  

The black guy is still on the ground bleeding out, and the government gets to pretend like it actually helped

2018-02-25 13:03:21 UTC  

Meanwhile all it did was make everything worse like usual

2018-02-25 13:03:44 UTC  

but hey... feminism is working on making affirmative action redundant... so there is one good thing coming out if it ๐Ÿ˜„

2018-02-25 13:03:53 UTC  

Plz no

2018-02-25 13:04:22 UTC  

if you can self identify as a black woman you get all the affirmative action you want ๐Ÿ˜„

2018-02-25 13:04:54 UTC  

replacing the unqualified black workers with unqualified female workers as a forced quota wont help the business or hard working people

2018-02-25 13:05:03 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/398973785426100234/417305997372030977/image.png

2018-02-25 13:05:10 UTC  

and saying that you are not a black woman makes them a racist, transphobic bigot ๐Ÿ˜„

2018-02-25 13:05:37 UTC  

funny thing is that if women just accepted a 23% pay cut they'd actually achieve their hiring amount ๐Ÿ˜›

2018-02-25 13:06:40 UTC  

they could also just work higher paid jobs to fill that 23% black hole

2018-02-25 13:08:57 UTC  

and "they" does not include every single woman.

2018-02-25 13:09:00 UTC  

no it wouldnt

2018-02-25 13:09:27 UTC  

if they only work 77% of the time they'll get paid 77% of the 100% wage at any salary

2018-02-25 13:10:37 UTC  

they work more than 77% of the time.

2018-02-25 13:11:32 UTC  

but the adjusted pay gap is somewhere between 4% and 6% and still does not include every variable.

2018-02-25 13:12:18 UTC  

because you can't include every variable

2018-02-25 13:12:23 UTC  

there is no variable

2018-02-25 13:12:38 UTC  

you accept the wage to work in said job

2018-02-25 13:12:49 UTC  

if you're not happy with it, you don't take the job

2018-02-25 13:14:34 UTC  

i worked a job where we got 2% of every sale. that is a variable that can not appropriately be included in a statistic like that.

2018-02-25 13:15:14 UTC  

that is the accepted wage then

2018-02-25 13:15:33 UTC  

the accepted wage was the base salary ๐Ÿ˜‰

2018-02-25 13:15:42 UTC  

and the additional 2%

2018-02-25 13:15:46 UTC  

sure.

2018-02-25 13:16:00 UTC  

but how do you reflect that in stats like that?