that the problematic guy in the video

isn't native,

"Alloysious Massaquoi was born in Liberia and moved at the age of four to Edinburgh, where he attended Boroughmuir High School."

so it would be even harder for him to emulate with the native culture

Right.

i mean not to an extreme deal because hey the difference between born and 4 in terms of relating to a culture isint that much, but i can ignore it

cant*

It would also have a lot to do with the means, reasons, and parental situation in migration.

basicly ive been trying to argue an ethnonationalist point this entire time which is to say that if you dont have an ethnic relation to the culture you live in then its harder for you to suport that culture. i supose the next line of thought would be "why live in a culture you dont have ehtnic relation too"

Put simply, culture can be chosen.

If you don't want to live in a culture you have no relationship to, that's a choice.

it can, but its easier to choose when theres people tto look up to in it that you can relate to. and its scentificly proven we relate to people who look more like us better than those who dont, regardless of our race

on average

Most definitely.

I can get that.

But then we get into the realm of authoritarianism.

Just because something is the average

does that mean that you make your laws based on that average?

Do you make your laws rigid, and in opposition to the outliers?

At what point is the cutoff of majority?

51%? 75%? are the bottom 25% the problem? the bottom 10%?

If you remove those, the average shifts.

That's the essence of a purity spiral.

The point of culture is that it can be adopted.

if your not serving the average your not serving the most. but that actually isint the point of this. it can be argued you serve both the majority and minority by segragating them if the minority has less of a chance of being happy sharing the space of the majority regardless of what you do as a governemnt or a society and the happyness of the minority effects your majority

But as for the members of an ethnic group that don't share the same history, but do share the same values

Do you weigh their ethnicity as more important as their values?

Do you judge them by the group, or by the individual?

you can only make rules for groups but you must account for individuals

That's a relatively fair answer.

See, the true way out of this is actually about as hard as ethno-nationalism, but far more fair.

Hold everyone to the same standard

and leave the exit door open.

i think most people will adopt the native culture under normal cercomstances, however this is not the case in extreme cercomstances which you as a social engineer cannot always predict and can not always prevent.

mass immigation is an example of an extreme cercomstance

I mean, Our pal Aryan over there says we should just *force* everyone not white to leave.

another example is whatever the fuck is going on with black people in america

I don't think it's NECESSARY to do so.

i would disagree with his move

except maybe in europe for anyone whos part of the mass immigation there

because those huge population spikes will become cultural problems over time