but most of the time im not having any problems

@.B how does the aggregator site make money to keep itself online

content creators have to pay to use it

ads, an aggregator site is cheap to keep up anyway

or that

I'm going to Japan in 1 week. When I settle I might work on that

though i dont think it would be all that unatractive for content creators to pay a small amount to use it

Matt Drudge/Drudge Report is probably one of the "biggest" aggregators that I am aware of

though I'm getting a lot of offers related to Blockchain 🤔

maybe work on a two fold approach. make an aggregator site for viewing, and one for uploading. Maybe charge for the uploader, run adds on the aggregator

@Arch-Fiend you can't promote an aggregator initially if you asks for people to pay it

do ads work on embedded views from youtube?

alright

it also reduces the value of YT's subscription, as the aggregator subs rise in relevance

if you make it one button click to upload a video to say youtube and bitchute at the same time, and the tool handles filling out descriptions and title boxes, all that jazz

I wouldn't do it embedded

the idea is simply to fix the subscription problem and visibility of what people want to see

so i need to visit one site, just to then go visit another site?

that's what an aggregator is, pretty much

why not skip the middle man? i mean, part of the problem is that subs don't know they have missed a video, and so long as you can still go to a person page and look at the last upload (which may soon not work on youtube), why would i go to this other site?

Science has proven it

remember, people are lazy

too many clicks and people get annoyed

UI design 101

@Grenade123 if you have 50 subs, do you go to their channels one by one?

I don't

see the only problem i have with an aggregator is do people even know what they are anymore? like the idea is to fight the hidding of content on youtube by youtube, and youtube isint just where videos are uploaded but its also the biggest aggregator for videos in the world besides like the video section on google when you search. so how does an aggragator actually increase growth? advertising the aggragator?

the idea was just to fix the visibility issue

not the ad revenue

yeah i just asked about the visibility issue

depending on the volume of people in the aggregator, it can start paying creators for viewers that come from there

the main way aggragators work is sub sharing

@Deadpool Bruce Jenner proved that already i believe, becoming wamen of the year

`1) alt websites get like no views. which means extra work, time taken away from making videos, for potential no return
2) youtube can control if you get money from ads
3) youtube can control how easy it is to find your video
4) having all your eggs in one basket is never a good idea
5) Revenue is a combination of views and ads
6) views is a combo of number of videos, and quality/content of the videos
7) alt sites will, hopefully grow but will do so slowly`

if we can making it easier to maintain 2 or more video upload sites, that should help solve the rest of these problems i would think. anyone agree?

you should add a 8) that actually says what i said before because what i said before was actually very accurate

followed by the visibility issue we could be handled with the same tool by promoting on things like twitter and other places all at once

it would remedy it a bit atleast,
but if you're always gonna upload on youtube regardless, not many people will cross over to alt-sites

but subsharing doesent actually increase the bulk subscribers the entire section of people youve agragated together except that their veiws go up and hopefuly that has ramafications on youtube, but the fact that it doesent is the problem

@Arch-Fiend i modified it because this was a list of problems, and that wasn't really a problem but a solution.

oh sorry then