all this data is from like 1990s for a study done in 2006

made by people who actually know what rekt means mind you

oh hey, this is the table he was referencing

neat

"The hypothesis that a strong sense of ethnic identity is likely to decrease the probability of problem behaviors was supported for crack or cocaine initiation and the frequencies of substance use and violence. "....in 13 yos

13 yo smoking crack.

gotta add that to "This is America"

admitedly i knew alcoholics in middleschool

fucking hell

crack is a bit out there though

i guess i got lucky going to a small school in the middle of the mountains

in extreme ghettos i can imagine it, but there arnt any of those in washington

i went to a small school in the middle of the forest

interesting

all i remember in middle school was them trying to ban dodge ball.

which we all rebelled against because fuck pussy parents

i come from the state that a small group of people were so imbred they turned blue

ummm wut

sure that was inbreeding and not meth cooking?

not that those are not often found together

" Last, the respondents were mainly from one geographical location; thus, we advise readers to use caution in generalizing the findings to youths in other geographic regions."

oops

https://owlcation.com/humanities/Blue-People-in-Kentucky-A-True-Story-of-a-Family-with-Blue-Skin

oh right, those people

natsocs are gay as fuck

Well lads all I see is you bitching that you can't argue against my points so you just retreat into race denial you neo lysenkoists.

@Deleted User na I just think your childish

I think someone who believes something without evidence and then claims that they are an empiricist is stupid.

I have seen your point, but sadly you forgot a key point, we can change and become better. to reduce ourselves be dividing into bullshit groups is stupid

Dividing into groups is a survival tactic, because it's harder to distory a group than an individual, what do you think divide and conquer means?

what... dude. that is the worst understanding of divide and conquer I have ever heard?

I see it in the modern context as (((them))) dividing a group into atomized individuals.

yes, but your point was "Dividing into groups is a survival tactic" I.E it is good to divide into groups for safety aka fracturing the whole, than you said"because it's harder to *destroy* a group" aka the whole "than an individual"aka a group, which is wrong in the context of divide and conquer because its whole point is to divide a whole into groups because they are easier to destroy

Dude, dont call people retarded just because they dont see how you do Aussie

I think his point is that if the only thing holding a group together is a common look, then the group isnt strong to begin with.

You need something stronger than skin color or blood.

Yes My point is that (((they))) have devided white people in their own countires against each other with communism, feminism, multiracialism, multiculturalism and libertarianism.

haha

And I think its just assholes in general that happen to be mostly jewish

The people behind Libertarinism.

aa @GingaBomber you guys and the hatred for arbitrary groups

So its jewish = bad then?