Message from @Grenade123
Discord ID: 454117816426299392
and we are citing this for how adults do?
personally i woudlent go through the effert of arguing different case studys with someone about a topic as broad as race. if we cant even argue the spirit of the topic then theres no hope in finding ground on the nuances
i'm reading this because its funny as fuck
sure
this is what happens when you let scientists to their thing, they think asking kids these questions is not odd
there needs to be white nationalists rekt compolation videos
all this data is from like 1990s for a study done in 2006
made by people who actually know what rekt means mind you
oh hey, this is the table he was referencing
neat
"The hypothesis that a strong sense of ethnic identity is likely to decrease the probability of problem behaviors was supported for crack or cocaine initiation and the frequencies of substance use and violence. "....in 13 yos
13 yo smoking crack.
gotta add that to "This is America"
admitedly i knew alcoholics in middleschool
fucking hell
crack is a bit out there though
i guess i got lucky going to a small school in the middle of the mountains
in extreme ghettos i can imagine it, but there arnt any of those in washington
i went to a small school in the middle of the forest
interesting
which we all rebelled against because fuck pussy parents
i come from the state that a small group of people were so imbred they turned blue
ummm wut
sure that was inbreeding and not meth cooking?
not that those are not often found together
" Last, the respondents were mainly from one geographical location; thus, we advise readers to use caution in generalizing the findings to youths in other geographic regions."
oops
oh right, those people
natsocs are gay as fuck
Well lads all I see is you bitching that you can't argue against my points so you just retreat into race denial you neo lysenkoists.
@Deleted User na I just think your childish
I think someone who believes something without evidence and then claims that they are an empiricist is stupid.
I have seen your point, but sadly you forgot a key point, we can change and become better. to reduce ourselves be dividing into bullshit groups is stupid
Dividing into groups is a survival tactic, because it's harder to distory a group than an individual, what do you think divide and conquer means?
what... dude. that is the worst understanding of divide and conquer I have ever heard?
I see it in the modern context as (((them))) dividing a group into atomized individuals.
yes, but your point was "Dividing into groups is a survival tactic" I.E it is good to divide into groups for safety aka fracturing the whole, than you said"because it's harder to *destroy* a group" aka the whole "than an individual"aka a group, which is wrong in the context of divide and conquer because its whole point is to divide a whole into groups because they are easier to destroy
Dude, dont call people retarded just because they dont see how you do Aussie
I think his point is that if the only thing holding a group together is a common look, then the group isnt strong to begin with.
You need something stronger than skin color or blood.