technically all science is anecdotal, just peer reveiwed

emperical evidence requires observation

its not anecdotal if you can replicate the test. If you are citing anecdotal evidence, it means YOU can't replicate the test.

unless were using 2nd hand sources in our scientific papers in which case fuck that shit

"Self-Identification of Race/Ethnicity, Race/ethnicity is a social construct and thus can be imprecise and unstable"

oops, guess that invalidates the study according to him. this is the Seattle one https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3292211/

they were asking 13yos "In the past year, how often did you use crack or cocaine?"

oh, and this is all survey data

13yo, answer these questions

and we are citing this for how adults do?

personally i woudlent go through the effert of arguing different case studys with someone about a topic as broad as race. if we cant even argue the spirit of the topic then theres no hope in finding ground on the nuances

i'm reading this because its funny as fuck

sure

this is what happens when you let scientists to their thing, they think asking kids these questions is not odd

there needs to be white nationalists rekt compolation videos

all this data is from like 1990s for a study done in 2006

made by people who actually know what rekt means mind you

oh hey, this is the table he was referencing

neat

"The hypothesis that a strong sense of ethnic identity is likely to decrease the probability of problem behaviors was supported for crack or cocaine initiation and the frequencies of substance use and violence. "....in 13 yos

13 yo smoking crack.

gotta add that to "This is America"

admitedly i knew alcoholics in middleschool

fucking hell

crack is a bit out there though

i guess i got lucky going to a small school in the middle of the mountains

in extreme ghettos i can imagine it, but there arnt any of those in washington

i went to a small school in the middle of the forest

interesting

all i remember in middle school was them trying to ban dodge ball.

which we all rebelled against because fuck pussy parents

i come from the state that a small group of people were so imbred they turned blue

ummm wut

sure that was inbreeding and not meth cooking?

not that those are not often found together

" Last, the respondents were mainly from one geographical location; thus, we advise readers to use caution in generalizing the findings to youths in other geographic regions."

oops

https://owlcation.com/humanities/Blue-People-in-Kentucky-A-True-Story-of-a-Family-with-Blue-Skin

oh right, those people

natsocs are gay as fuck

Well lads all I see is you bitching that you can't argue against my points so you just retreat into race denial you neo lysenkoists.

@Deleted User na I just think your childish

I think someone who believes something without evidence and then claims that they are an empiricist is stupid.