Message from @citizen
Discord ID: 465299953254924298
its not enforced, specifically. but its the approach of cultural norms through law enforcement... or something. be a nice person. or not, im not your parent.
nobody said it was perfect..... also it will not prevent ppl from violating it either... all it would do it legitimize recoursive action againts those who violate it
you can hire security but it doesn't have authority to generally enforce the NAP is what you are getting at Rye ?
it is enforced Citizen, the government promises retribution if your NAP is violated
Well that is neat to know! is that in every state?
oh wait.... lol i get it
Its in every country that has a sovereign government that utilises law enforcement that protects you, if thats what you mean 😛
its more of a "negative" rights think too... traditional police would not have the right to enforece victimless crimes laws (thus violating the NAP)
yeah.... like i said earlier... i am not smart
thats okay, i tried to help out by explaining better :p
but its like the dunning krueger.... i know how stupid i am so im a little smart?
knowing your limits is insight
definitions of smart wages on the average of humanity, so as long as you're smarter than 3,5 billion humans, you're atleast a little smart 😄
But the police would be enforcing the NAP.
yes, they could do that, whats the problem with that?
they could enforce it and not violate it themselves
there isn't a problem with that
There's not
no victimless crimes laws
oh okay LOL
well gg
well then, thoughts on First Amendment auditors going into public spaces and auditing authorities. if the cops feel they are being harassed, does that violate the cops right. or are they screwed due to their oath.
I'm probing your ideology to better understand it.
an an NAP way.
😛
whats a victimless crime?
Most likely Drug use, for one.
like taking drugs
Prostitution.
btw the way i see it, Ancaps just want smaller countries, where they themselves think they can be king
Cuz an Ancap needs security to protect his property
Just like a government is protecting its sovereignty
they just wanna get rid of the branch above them so they can make the laws
if its in their charter for public auditing, they must be obligated to provided it.... it all boils down to current contracting laws anyways which are aleady in place
one man states basically
Well, the smallest possible country is yourself + your weapons
The best bit is that there are no taxes to yourself that you have to pay
true, but theres no welfare there either 😦
drugs should be regulated, but legal. same with hookin'... if we have a system, then it be easier to monitor and cut back on illegal and objectively immoral actions? but then we'd have to conform to a statehood that separates us from individuality.
and no closed borders 😄
Frankly, I'm with you on the drugs to an extent
(and not with you on drugs. Don't get me wrong)
I think some drugs should be regulated, but there are others that are dangerous enough that they should be illegal. Most of those are developed by pharmaceutical companies though.
but then if you do X drug you cannot own a firearm or operate a vehicle or not get Y license? i dunno