they wont be bcuz there will always be partnerships of other security firms who are ballsy enough to attack them and apprioriate their resources because they violated the law if the law was the NAP as a baseline

So Oligarchy?

im just talking about all your personal lives... its so ironic that you all still live by it in your every days lives if youre decent human beings who dont steal and mug other ppl, etc

a partnership, sounds like a coalition of parties, with an army

thats noy very Ancap now is it? it almost sounds like a government

if youre not a rapist, etc. guess what... you follow the NAP

We've already acknowledged that we follow the NAP

but sometimes we like to wrastle

We're questioning where you were going with that.

okay, but thats consentual LOL let's wrastle!

so doesnt violate the NAP just like boxing matches

the NAP isnt pacifism ... its just common sense

right. we need to empower men and turn them into the gladiators of past

guy i'd have killed several people if the law said i could, i follow the NAP cuz its enforced

Alright, poptarts, lets break this down then.

How do you see the NAP being enforced?

itd be enforced virtually similar to the same way we do it now by going after perpetrators

By who?

Well to me, the NAP is enforced through societal agreement. we raise our children to not hurt others and to tell the truth and yada yada yada. is it perfect? lol what is perfect? we'd have to go back to that nirvana shit i said earlier if you can comprehend how perfect this all is.

the MAJORITY of security firms are privatized in the first place.... only a small minority of security is police, etc

Not what I asked.

its not enforced, specifically. but its the approach of cultural norms through law enforcement... or something. be a nice person. or not, im not your parent.

nobody said it was perfect..... also it will not prevent ppl from violating it either... all it would do it legitimize recoursive action againts those who violate it

you can hire security but it doesn't have authority to generally enforce the NAP is what you are getting at Rye ?

it is enforced Citizen, the government promises retribution if your NAP is violated

Well that is neat to know! is that in every state?

oh wait.... lol i get it

Its in every country that has a sovereign government that utilises law enforcement that protects you, if thats what you mean 😛

its more of a "negative" rights think too... traditional police would not have the right to enforece victimless crimes laws (thus violating the NAP)

yeah.... like i said earlier... i am not smart

thats okay, i tried to help out by explaining better :p

but its like the dunning krueger.... i know how stupid i am so im a little smart?

knowing your limits is insight

definitions of smart wages on the average of humanity, so as long as you're smarter than 3,5 billion humans, you're atleast a little smart 😄

But the police would be enforcing the NAP.

yes, they could do that, whats the problem with that?

they could enforce it and not violate it themselves

there isn't a problem with that

There's not

no victimless crimes laws

oh okay LOL

well gg

well then, thoughts on First Amendment auditors going into public spaces and auditing authorities. if the cops feel they are being harassed, does that violate the cops right. or are they screwed due to their oath.