the NAP isnt pacifism ... its just common sense

right. we need to empower men and turn them into the gladiators of past

guy i'd have killed several people if the law said i could, i follow the NAP cuz its enforced

Alright, poptarts, lets break this down then.

How do you see the NAP being enforced?

itd be enforced virtually similar to the same way we do it now by going after perpetrators

By who?

Well to me, the NAP is enforced through societal agreement. we raise our children to not hurt others and to tell the truth and yada yada yada. is it perfect? lol what is perfect? we'd have to go back to that nirvana shit i said earlier if you can comprehend how perfect this all is.

the MAJORITY of security firms are privatized in the first place.... only a small minority of security is police, etc

Not what I asked.

its not enforced, specifically. but its the approach of cultural norms through law enforcement... or something. be a nice person. or not, im not your parent.

nobody said it was perfect..... also it will not prevent ppl from violating it either... all it would do it legitimize recoursive action againts those who violate it

you can hire security but it doesn't have authority to generally enforce the NAP is what you are getting at Rye ?

it is enforced Citizen, the government promises retribution if your NAP is violated

Well that is neat to know! is that in every state?

oh wait.... lol i get it

Its in every country that has a sovereign government that utilises law enforcement that protects you, if thats what you mean 😛

its more of a "negative" rights think too... traditional police would not have the right to enforece victimless crimes laws (thus violating the NAP)

yeah.... like i said earlier... i am not smart

thats okay, i tried to help out by explaining better :p

but its like the dunning krueger.... i know how stupid i am so im a little smart?

knowing your limits is insight

definitions of smart wages on the average of humanity, so as long as you're smarter than 3,5 billion humans, you're atleast a little smart 😄

But the police would be enforcing the NAP.

yes, they could do that, whats the problem with that?

they could enforce it and not violate it themselves

there isn't a problem with that

There's not

no victimless crimes laws

oh okay LOL

well gg

well then, thoughts on First Amendment auditors going into public spaces and auditing authorities. if the cops feel they are being harassed, does that violate the cops right. or are they screwed due to their oath.

I'm probing your ideology to better understand it.

an an NAP way.

😛

whats a victimless crime?

Most likely Drug use, for one.

like taking drugs

Prostitution.

btw the way i see it, Ancaps just want smaller countries, where they themselves think they can be king

Cuz an Ancap needs security to protect his property
Just like a government is protecting its sovereignty

they just wanna get rid of the branch above them so they can make the laws

if its in their charter for public auditing, they must be obligated to provided it.... it all boils down to current contracting laws anyways which are aleady in place