Message from @Dr.Wol
Discord ID: 466266768269377547
i just explained that,
With borders, YOU decide who comes in, and obviously you want someone taht contributes more than they cost, instead of someone that costs more than they contribute.
So you want "THE BEST", and the best comes from other developped nations, which are primarily white or asian 😉
that's not even what I want either 😃
no but thats why its an "issue"
I'm quite alright with people coming from the poor countries, legally
immigrants are going to be awesome citizens
and patriotic and all of that
I don't care if they're poor or not
Immigration for the sake of diversity is stupid. Immigration should be used to take people who will make the country better.
(in most cases)
you can be poor and make the country better
so that's not even an argument, or should be
but yeah merit based is good too
yes, but having a rich person (to pay taxes) or an educated person (to work difficult high-prosperity jobs) is a "Safer bet" than a "maybe he'll do well"
true
Of course you could be poor and make the country better. That's the great thing about merit. It ignores social status and race.
but that's basically calling for an ethnostate 😃 (substitute wealth for race)
i mean, would you rather have a licensed pilot fly your airplane? or a mexican who is nice and calls you his hombre? 😛
and has a plumbers license
just to reference that talk show woman 😄
por que no los dos?
I, for one, welcome our new Mexican plumber airline pilot hombres
Kelly Osborne was it?
yes
god i'm terrible with remembering names for certain 😛
merit based with a quota, good
i always second guess myself
open borders bad
and that's what this comes down to
like how i sometimes think Tim Pool is called Tim Pond
sorry, no borders, not open borders
I even love how taht other woman goes "Oh thats... No...."
she totally knew that was such a bad things to say 😄
yup
but all in all thats why they prioritise higher-value people for immigration, cuz its a safe bet
and it then gives the lower-skilled people less chances to fight over, and that means less people from Less-developed nations
Elimination of borders serves two different ideologies, neither of which I agree with. Corporatists would be for the elimination of borders for the sake of easier trade and access to cheaper workforce. The whole reason Socialists are for eliminating borders is redistribution of wealth. The United States is wealthy, and one cannot simply sit on their wealth, it has to be shared. Redistributed. Anyone who wants the wealth of the United States should be able to take it. At least, that's what I get from it.
take it, no.. .earn it, hell yes
I disagree on that, too.
I mean