Message from @RyeNorth

Discord ID: 466303113557704704


2018-07-10 17:49:55 UTC  

take it, no.. .earn it, hell yes

2018-07-10 17:56:38 UTC  

I disagree on that, too.

2018-07-10 17:56:57 UTC  

I mean

2018-07-10 17:57:01 UTC  

I'm not opposed to immigration

2018-07-10 17:57:05 UTC  

you disagree with being able to earn a piece of the pie?

2018-07-10 17:57:11 UTC  

but I don't think the US needs to go about headhunting

2018-07-10 17:57:18 UTC  

I think we need more pies.

2018-07-10 17:57:25 UTC  

there are always more pies

2018-07-10 17:57:29 UTC  

its not a zero sum game

2018-07-10 17:58:01 UTC  

just because someone becomes successful doesnt mean someone else has to become unsuccessful

2018-07-10 17:58:03 UTC  

It's a zero sum game packed within a non-zero sum game

2018-07-10 17:58:20 UTC  

The US Economy is, largely, zero sum.

2018-07-10 17:58:41 UTC  

The World Economy is... mostly not?

2018-07-10 18:00:26 UTC  

existing economys that rely on renewible resources extraction rates are zerosum, if you find a new source of resources and have the ability to harvest it on your own dollor for a profit thats when its more than zero sum

2018-07-10 18:01:35 UTC  

Sure, but I can't remember a time when it's been zero sum in the modern age

2018-07-10 18:01:39 UTC  

Well, what I'm getting at is, if we've got no borders, if we just let anyone in - a deal that will likely only be one way

2018-07-10 18:01:45 UTC  

there's always been a new scientifc discovery

2018-07-10 18:01:45 UTC  

but you have to have a truly bombing potental for that or a dying population for immigration to be helpful to that

2018-07-10 18:01:48 UTC  

or a new business, etc

2018-07-10 18:02:02 UTC  

america is actually becoming more zero sum as time goes on

2018-07-10 18:02:05 UTC  

It essentially lets other nations raid our resources and send them home.

2018-07-10 18:02:08 UTC  

no borders means you aren't a country

2018-07-10 18:02:19 UTC  

Basically, yes.

2018-07-10 18:02:27 UTC  

But it's what's being legitimately argued for

2018-07-10 18:02:31 UTC  

I know

2018-07-10 18:02:33 UTC  

because more things are being owned, less things are being found in america

2018-07-10 18:02:34 UTC  

and I think it's wrong

2018-07-10 18:02:49 UTC  

I think anyone here thinks it's wrong.

2018-07-10 18:02:59 UTC  

when more is owned and less is found you find a plataeu in your economy

2018-07-10 18:03:02 UTC  

yeah but the debate isn't people here

2018-07-10 18:03:13 UTC  

the debate is, how can anyone think, in their right mind, that it's a sane idea

2018-07-10 18:03:36 UTC  

As I outlined, it's redistribution of wealth.

2018-07-10 18:05:16 UTC  

Basically, I propose that the socialists who are pushing for an elimination of borders view the United States as a whole as the bourgeoisie class

2018-07-10 18:05:43 UTC  

well 34K/year is the 1% worldwide

2018-07-10 18:05:54 UTC  

Exactly.

2018-07-10 18:06:17 UTC  

And equality can't be achieved while a 1% group exists unchecked.

2018-07-10 18:06:39 UTC  

It's absolutely mental, but these ARE commies we're talking about...

2018-07-10 18:06:52 UTC  

i don't think socialist really realize how poor the world is.

2018-07-10 18:07:06 UTC  

I think that's fair, as well.

2018-07-10 18:07:33 UTC  

if they did, they would realize that not even all the wealth of the US could raise the world even .1% higher on the economic ladder

2018-07-10 18:08:20 UTC  

it would mean that those same socialist would need to become mountains poorer than the poorest person in the US, as dictated by their ideology.