Message from @Beemann

Discord ID: 472098708633157652


2018-07-26 17:47:20 UTC  

Because removing people from welfare that need welfare isn't good.

2018-07-26 17:47:34 UTC  

The point is that their basic needs are already paid for

2018-07-26 17:47:41 UTC  

There are people that need substationally more help than 1,000 check.

2018-07-26 17:47:42 UTC  

So you dont need a redundant payment scheme

2018-07-26 17:48:07 UTC  

You already admitted that's an arbitrary figure you set as a baseline

2018-07-26 17:48:10 UTC  

You can use the same scheme and bureaucracy to pay them.

2018-07-26 17:48:51 UTC  

UBI initially wouldn't been all your basic needs met.

2018-07-26 17:49:10 UTC  

probably.

2018-07-26 17:49:39 UTC  

Okay but if you're talking about phasing that in you would also phase out welfare

2018-07-26 17:49:43 UTC  

how does that help people who can't find work anymore due to automation?

They need basic needs met, or they'll die 😮

2018-07-26 17:49:44 UTC  

It'd more likely just be extra money to help people become more mobile.

2018-07-26 17:50:10 UTC  

A solution can't come whole cloth.

2018-07-26 17:50:45 UTC  

You introduce UBI now, you have the method of distribution, and it would increase over time.

2018-07-26 17:50:50 UTC  

as needed.

2018-07-26 17:50:59 UTC  

if thats the case,

You just added more welfare, and more taxes, and no fix

2018-07-26 17:51:01 UTC  

But eventually you would phase out welfare, would you not?

2018-07-26 17:51:11 UTC  

Once it hits basic needs level

2018-07-26 17:51:21 UTC  

Maybe, I don't think work is totally going to vanish.

2018-07-26 17:51:35 UTC  

manual labor jobs will

2018-07-26 17:51:40 UTC  

Probably.

2018-07-26 17:51:43 UTC  

Could you elaborate?

2018-07-26 17:51:45 UTC  

No they won't.

2018-07-26 17:51:50 UTC  

Most white collar work as well.

2018-07-26 17:51:54 UTC  

not all, but many will

2018-07-26 17:51:55 UTC  

Automation tends to be a bit too inflexible.

2018-07-26 17:52:09 UTC  

There are industries scaling back automation at the moment.

2018-07-26 17:52:11 UTC  

Currently is inflexible.

2018-07-26 17:52:22 UTC  

No, it's physically inflexible.

2018-07-26 17:52:28 UTC  

3d Printed houses for example Pratel

Rig a big machine that can drive around and just be activated, powered up, and build your house

2018-07-26 17:52:34 UTC  

You build your tooling and it's millions of dollars to re-tool.

2018-07-26 17:52:45 UTC  

3d printing radically changes the argument.

2018-07-26 17:52:53 UTC  

Now you have to play people for complexity.

2018-07-26 17:52:57 UTC  

Yes, it's CURRENTY inflexible.

2018-07-26 17:52:58 UTC  

Which is even harder.

2018-07-26 17:53:09 UTC  

The manufacturing is more flexible but the engineering is much harder.

2018-07-26 17:53:13 UTC  

I agree, AI is not inflexible.

2018-07-26 17:53:31 UTC  

AI right now is very much not what people think it is. It's very inflexible.

2018-07-26 17:53:35 UTC  

well thats the point Pratel

You replace 100's of builders, for a machine

And you keep the engineers working

2018-07-26 17:53:45 UTC  

You don't even do that.

2018-07-26 17:53:55 UTC  

You still need someone to survey and install.

2018-07-26 17:53:56 UTC  

Again, you're thinking big dumb robots, AI is not a big dumb robot. It's a robot that can learn for thousands of other robots.