Message from @Dan V
Discord ID: 475012512572637216
because you're not allowed to laugh
The Left are the new puritans.
i must thank the far left. they made me realize that religion is a symptom, not a source.
Can we upload images here?
No
That is a violation of my 1A rights
Took my crap to the firearms chat in protest
You can at rank 10
Aye someone said so at the fake-news room but you can never trust the fake-stream media
But still you can't upload images in this text channel
Read the description
reading is for nerds
tru
Lol
I really enjoy Tim's work and am watching the backlog. The narrative he keeps pushing about the SCOTUS cake decision and that you should just "bake the cake" is wrong. The gay couple specifically targeted that baker because of his religions beliefs and the baker was willing to sell them a generic cake off the shelf, he just did not want to support their wedding message. Naturally this couple made a stink of it as was their goal and got a court case out of it. Freedom of association should be preserved and the government does not have a right to order a business to do service. If the public finds a business is discriminating, they are free to send their own message by not doing business there and causing its destruction.
Whether you agree with my conclusion or not the fact is the issue was far more complex than "just bake a cake bigot" and the fact that Tim brings this up over and over again so simply is really annoying.
I think there's a difference between 'baking the cake' and 'selling the cake'.
And that's part of what came up in that decision, if I'm not mistaken.
The bakery had no issue selling one to them
So this is going to sound *really* conspiratorial. But based on the wiki page, Quinn was deeply in favor of encryption. Jeong gave a talk in which she came out in favor of SJW media censorship ("we must silence some to give others the chance to speak").
Is it possible that the *real* motive here is ideological? The media establishment has been waging war on open exchange online; is it possible the editorial board is trying to build up a collection of people to really start going after unrestricted speech?
@Dan V Yeah, I got nothing to show it's actually happening. Only a couple spots on what the people in question think.
ehhhhh does sound conspiracyish but not soo out there that id say its possible
tryin to collect enough cards for a mono sjw pure aggro deck
not sure i t can beat out the hybrid conservative/centre left controll deck we got runnin this season
BELIEVE IN THE HEART OF THE CARDS
so this is it huh
with infowars now gone and nobody willing to adopt an alternative platform, do we just accpet defeat and adapt the regressive mindset?
I never followed infowars, and i'm doing quite alright 😛
you will for now yes
i barely even followed their content or like ever
but the deplatforming of him across the entire internet is just mass censorship
I agree, it sets a very bad precident 😦
this is just step 1
but i don't follow alex jones, and never cared for his news cuz it seemed like lunatic conspiracies most of the time
you mean all the time
he is a joke and you know it
anyways, this is phase 1 of deplatforming people that doesnt align with their ideology
well some of it ended up being correct, if you removed the ranting madness around it 😛
im afraid of what phase 2 would be