Message from @Grenade123
Discord ID: 476189724441182218
or the military and police can decide not to fight, it doesnt absolutely have to be a violent change
Is proof enough that the common will is not enough to rule.
an-caps have great arguments for lessoning government involvement.
NatSocs have great arguments for reducing crime rate.
Just because it's a great argument, doesn't mean it's right.
do they thought?
a violent overthrow wouldnt last anyways
An ethnic nationalist would say that certain ethnicities are more prone to violence and should be dealt with accordingly.
Strictly speaking, this WOULD lead to a decrease in crime
But there's a core issue that you could address instead.
Cultural, of course.
you know what would get ride of more crime? removing all people at the same economic level
Elimination of the lower class?
isn't that what removing most of the ethnic minorities would do?
Elimination based on IQ?
Not entirely, though
no, and therefore there would still be crime
Because there are plenty of blacks who have broken through the supposed barriers
Hell, Asians are higher earners than Whites.
an inconvenient fact, you'll notice Asians are omitted by any NatSoc graph.
more over, you'd lose more beneficial people by removing all people not of a certain ethnic class that just removing most poor people
So if you eliminated people based on earnings, you'd be less diverse to be sure, but you wouldn't be ethnically pure
you'd also have really backed up sewers.
no, but we were talking about crime
Alright, let's trace that back then
statistically, most violent criminals come from either poor or broken families
Eliminate blacks - lower crime, white ethno-nationalism, massively bloody hands
with ethnicity, you are more likely to leave a murder or thief and deport a doctor
Eliminate Lower Earners - Lower Crime, Less diversity, Trash Pickup Delayed indefinitely.
eh, just pay trash pickup people more, they are no longer the lowest earners
plus, more jobs!
I'm not so sure that's the case across the board. Not that I'm arguing for it.
either way, their arguments are not that great
don't actually address the problem, just put a Band-Aid on it
but if you have a government that eliminates people, the united states would bomb it and kill everyone
ignore the exception that can disprove the trend
hey, no more humans, no more human problems, bomb away
such nihilism
just make sure you get everyone
hey, didn't say it was the best solution, just a solution.
Like I said, I wouldn't argue in favor of EthNat solutions