Message from @RyeNorth
Discord ID: 476190386491097107
you know what would get ride of more crime? removing all people at the same economic level
Elimination of the lower class?
isn't that what removing most of the ethnic minorities would do?
Elimination based on IQ?
Not entirely, though
no, and therefore there would still be crime
Because there are plenty of blacks who have broken through the supposed barriers
Hell, Asians are higher earners than Whites.
an inconvenient fact, you'll notice Asians are omitted by any NatSoc graph.
more over, you'd lose more beneficial people by removing all people not of a certain ethnic class that just removing most poor people
So if you eliminated people based on earnings, you'd be less diverse to be sure, but you wouldn't be ethnically pure
you'd also have really backed up sewers.
no, but we were talking about crime
Alright, let's trace that back then
statistically, most violent criminals come from either poor or broken families
Eliminate blacks - lower crime, white ethno-nationalism, massively bloody hands
with ethnicity, you are more likely to leave a murder or thief and deport a doctor
Eliminate Lower Earners - Lower Crime, Less diversity, Trash Pickup Delayed indefinitely.
eh, just pay trash pickup people more, they are no longer the lowest earners
plus, more jobs!
either way, their arguments are not that great
don't actually address the problem, just put a Band-Aid on it
but if you have a government that eliminates people, the united states would bomb it and kill everyone
ignore the exception that can disprove the trend
hey, no more humans, no more human problems, bomb away
such nihilism
just make sure you get everyone
hey, didn't say it was the best solution, just a solution.
Like I said, I wouldn't argue in favor of EthNat solutions
it's so wasteful when you could recycle people
But if you ignore ethics, they're pragmatic.
think of the environment
Still, the problems I have with anarchical solutions...
Let's start with the first
It depends on everyone holding the same principles in roughly the same or similar priority
something that we can't even do with a state
we're kind of holding the same principles about direct slavery
Alright...
politics is downstream from culture, the culture changes and the government adjusts
But how are you going to convince people to uphold the NAP when there are people who claim that speech is violence?