Message from @Grenade123

Discord ID: 476190437640765450


2018-08-07 00:46:25 UTC  

Elimination of the lower class?

2018-08-07 00:46:42 UTC  

isn't that what removing most of the ethnic minorities would do?

2018-08-07 00:46:46 UTC  

Elimination based on IQ?

2018-08-07 00:46:52 UTC  

Not entirely, though

2018-08-07 00:47:03 UTC  

no, and therefore there would still be crime

2018-08-07 00:47:13 UTC  

Because there are plenty of blacks who have broken through the supposed barriers

2018-08-07 00:47:28 UTC  

Hell, Asians are higher earners than Whites.

2018-08-07 00:47:42 UTC  

an inconvenient fact, you'll notice Asians are omitted by any NatSoc graph.

2018-08-07 00:47:57 UTC  

more over, you'd lose more beneficial people by removing all people not of a certain ethnic class that just removing most poor people

2018-08-07 00:48:18 UTC  

So if you eliminated people based on earnings, you'd be less diverse to be sure, but you wouldn't be ethnically pure

2018-08-07 00:48:30 UTC  

you'd also have really backed up sewers.

2018-08-07 00:48:32 UTC  

no, but we were talking about crime

2018-08-07 00:48:57 UTC  

Alright, let's trace that back then

2018-08-07 00:49:00 UTC  

statistically, most violent criminals come from either poor or broken families

2018-08-07 00:49:18 UTC  

Eliminate blacks - lower crime, white ethno-nationalism, massively bloody hands

2018-08-07 00:49:35 UTC  

with ethnicity, you are more likely to leave a murder or thief and deport a doctor

2018-08-07 00:49:59 UTC  

Eliminate Lower Earners - Lower Crime, Less diversity, Trash Pickup Delayed indefinitely.

2018-08-07 00:50:28 UTC  

eh, just pay trash pickup people more, they are no longer the lowest earners

2018-08-07 00:50:34 UTC  

plus, more jobs!

2018-08-07 00:50:35 UTC  

I'm not so sure that's the case across the board. Not that I'm arguing for it.

2018-08-07 00:50:47 UTC  

either way, their arguments are not that great

2018-08-07 00:51:08 UTC  

don't actually address the problem, just put a Band-Aid on it

2018-08-07 00:51:29 UTC  

but if you have a government that eliminates people, the united states would bomb it and kill everyone

2018-08-07 00:51:31 UTC  

ignore the exception that can disprove the trend

2018-08-07 00:51:46 UTC  

hey, no more humans, no more human problems, bomb away

2018-08-07 00:51:55 UTC  

such nihilism

2018-08-07 00:51:59 UTC  

just make sure you get everyone

2018-08-07 00:52:19 UTC  

hey, didn't say it was the best solution, just a solution.

2018-08-07 00:52:32 UTC  

Like I said, I wouldn't argue in favor of EthNat solutions

2018-08-07 00:52:45 UTC  

it's so wasteful when you could recycle people

2018-08-07 00:52:49 UTC  

But if you ignore ethics, they're pragmatic.

2018-08-07 00:52:51 UTC  

think of the environment

2018-08-07 00:54:14 UTC  

Still, the problems I have with anarchical solutions...

2018-08-07 00:54:33 UTC  

Let's start with the first

2018-08-07 00:54:59 UTC  

It depends on everyone holding the same principles in roughly the same or similar priority

2018-08-07 00:55:13 UTC  

something that we can't even do with a state

2018-08-07 00:56:15 UTC  

we're kind of holding the same principles about direct slavery

2018-08-07 00:56:36 UTC  

Alright...

2018-08-07 00:56:54 UTC  

politics is downstream from culture, the culture changes and the government adjusts

2018-08-07 00:56:59 UTC  

But how are you going to convince people to uphold the NAP when there are people who claim that speech is violence?

2018-08-07 00:57:52 UTC  

yeah the trends are not looking good