You can't sustain communism in a setting larger than, say, a farm.
A single plot of land.
And even then it's only because the whole thing is consentual.
I'd say you can't sustain communism in a setting larger than an ant colony but what do I know
lol
communism would just exile members that don't contribute
If it was bound by an overarching state, yes.
If it wasn't bound to those rules, gulags.
Well when you aren;t contributing the food people stop giving you food
think of minecraft
if you have played with friends
Hippy communes were a thing too
Or other things with friends in real life where you give each other stuff or services knowing they would do the same for you
they all failed because a society full of drug addicts generally turns to shit
ya
it's shit
most of them were commies cuz they just wanted free heroiN
That is real communism
but when they equalized their heroin
they very quickly realized
im confused about how much trade communists are ok with
there was no heroin left
It's confusing because they refuse to define such a thing
Trade would be as much as people need to take to be okay with letting others take from them
some of them call for abolishing money, others just claim communism just means free healthcare
Free heatlhcare is socialism technically
or maybe thats socialism, i have trouble keeping them apart
Anyways
"free"
Back to Anarcho Capitalism
Anarcho Capitalism is EVE online
Anarcho Capitalism is EVE online, but there are no servers.
Self-defeating because online w/ no servers?
Except for one fat trust fund kid somewhere who paid a development company to design him a personal game
havent tried it
star citizen
where you pay tens of thousands of dollars for a copy of a 3d model
I'm not gonna touch that game until at least 5 years after it's official release
yes
I'm just not gonna touch it.
