they very quickly realized
im confused about how much trade communists are ok with
there was no heroin left
It's confusing because they refuse to define such a thing
Trade would be as much as people need to take to be okay with letting others take from them
some of them call for abolishing money, others just claim communism just means free healthcare
Free heatlhcare is socialism technically
or maybe thats socialism, i have trouble keeping them apart
Anyways
"free"
Back to Anarcho Capitalism
Anarcho Capitalism is EVE online
lol
Anarcho Capitalism is EVE online, but there are no servers.
Self-defeating because online w/ no servers?
Except for one fat trust fund kid somewhere who paid a development company to design him a personal game
havent tried it
star citizen
where you pay tens of thousands of dollars for a copy of a 3d model
I'm not gonna touch that game until at least 5 years after it's official release
yes
I'm just not gonna touch it.
I have a few star citizen ships
only even remotely ancap game i can think of is the witcher 3
sure i kill that monster if you pay me
basically fable
Maybe I'm just confused on the concept of ancap, but how exactly is that anarchistic?
Games aren't really a good way of making examples...
the lack of a centralized regulatory system
"I'll do the thing, but I want recompense" is just capitalism, isn't it?
the vast majority of games i feel like im unintentionally on the wrong team
Kind of, yes.
But stuff like Witcher or Fable don't demonstrate ancap
Multiplayer games demonstrate human behavior
The fact that those are the comparisons drawn DO Illustrate the flaw though
ExceptionalFeather: Far better than a single player game
nah they demonstrate human behavior when you know you dont have to worry about any consequences, its a bit different
There are some consequences though
They demonstrate the concept with the existence of one human element and a bunch of predictable AIs
yeah but not the same at all
just not the ultimate endless nothingness as one
