Corporations regulate the internet right now

which is wrong

but imposing more regulation wont help

Well i cant really argue against that

Ok what do you think is gonna happen and/or needs to be done if anything

im presuming you think nothing needs to be done

@Beemann
```Government's purpose is to protect private property```
Its purpose is to protect the private people, not (just) their property.

Life, liberty and proerty.

Your body is your property

...wich is why the Gouvernment should protect the people from evil organizations such as Facebook or Twitter.

Wew

In what way should they be protected?

Not what they meant by property.

I'm the one whose statement is being questioned

and should uphold the freedom of the Market and suppress anti-competitive behavior from companys that can afford it - for example Geforce Partner Programme....

So it doesn't matter what someone else meant

How is the market free if the government tells companies how to run? How is free, contractual decision making anti competitive?

Yes it does, if you're not using the same definitions an argument is just two people yelling into the void.

There are multiple contexts for property, beyond "life liberty and property"

How's the Market free when one Company can blackmail their partners to not use the competition with for example Gaming Names??

Self ownership is the cornerstone of all other rights, I would argue

Government shouldn't tell companies how to run, except when attempting to negate externalities.

Again, Government should prevent abuse from all sides. They are to enforce the rules.

>blackmail their partners
How are they managing that?

If you don't do it, we do not do business with you

Abuse is a real flimsy word there @Stefan Payne .

If we are talking about things like Intel or nVidia, where Monopoly isn't far off, the Gouvernment should watch them and prevent them from abusing their power.

Intel is a monopoly.

>has competitors
>is a monopoly
Pick one

Not close to one.

It is a monopoly.

In what sense?

Every computer chip made is licensed or sold by intel.

Specifically CPU's

When AMD makes a CPU they pay intel a licensing fee for said chip.

Source?

https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-intel-x86-cpu,7285.html

That's from when the deal was going to expire in 2009.

>x86
That's not the only CPU architecture

And it might actually fuck us in the long run to keep using it

Okay, but if you want a desktop, or laptop computer that's what you're getting.