im a Laissez-faire capitalist

I mean ive grown more libertarian the more authoritarian the EU n shit is getting

Well im fine with most of that

Im just seeing a problem in that what we got isnt capitalist at all

thats the result of collectivism

Most of that is indeed result of government interference, if not all

well im talking about philisophy

Yea i know, im talking about practical reality of today.
We dont need regulations on social media, styx is what i think needs to be done, an internet bill of rights

lul

internet bill of rights is just property rights

Not exactly

ISP's cant cut you off because they dont like what you say using their service

lul

i dont know what ur lulling about

@tritrium how you still wanna violate property rights

You are arguing from an utopian position

regulating the internet just makes thing worse even if we did it now

Corporations regulate the internet right now

which is wrong

but imposing more regulation wont help

Well i cant really argue against that

Ok what do you think is gonna happen and/or needs to be done if anything

im presuming you think nothing needs to be done

@Beemann
```Government's purpose is to protect private property```
Its purpose is to protect the private people, not (just) their property.

Life, liberty and proerty.

Your body is your property

...wich is why the Gouvernment should protect the people from evil organizations such as Facebook or Twitter.

Wew

In what way should they be protected?

Not what they meant by property.

I'm the one whose statement is being questioned

and should uphold the freedom of the Market and suppress anti-competitive behavior from companys that can afford it - for example Geforce Partner Programme....

So it doesn't matter what someone else meant

How is the market free if the government tells companies how to run? How is free, contractual decision making anti competitive?

Yes it does, if you're not using the same definitions an argument is just two people yelling into the void.

There are multiple contexts for property, beyond "life liberty and property"

How's the Market free when one Company can blackmail their partners to not use the competition with for example Gaming Names??

Self ownership is the cornerstone of all other rights, I would argue

Government shouldn't tell companies how to run, except when attempting to negate externalities.

Again, Government should prevent abuse from all sides. They are to enforce the rules.

>blackmail their partners
How are they managing that?