Message from @Existence is identity

Discord ID: 512684047906897936


2018-11-15 17:18:58 UTC  

no

2018-11-15 17:19:18 UTC  

if there were no rules, there would have been no Compaq, Dell and co

2018-11-15 17:19:55 UTC  

Yes the rules being force and market separated until someones rights are violated

2018-11-15 17:20:01 UTC  

*are

2018-11-15 17:23:18 UTC  

Yes and now you need a market that's protected by Patents and needs billions of dollars to enter.

2018-11-15 17:24:01 UTC  

And the primary source can just bribe the manufacturers to not use other stuff than theirs....

2018-11-15 17:24:39 UTC  

So in short: you need the Rules and to enforce it, so that such things do not happen.

2018-11-15 17:27:43 UTC  

Wow, I'm in agreement with Stefan for the third time today and it's not even lunchtime. The end times are most certainly upon us. 🙀

2018-11-15 17:28:14 UTC  

Yeah, one of those Examples would be Microsoft ^^

2018-11-15 17:28:33 UTC  

And Google (Android)

2018-11-15 17:29:37 UTC  

So free market means that everyone plays to the same rules and doesn't abuse or misuse the power given by the market.

2018-11-15 17:31:23 UTC  

Now, after M$ left the Mobile Phone OS Market, Google was forced in the EU to charge money for Android.
M$ always charged for mobile Windows.

2018-11-15 17:31:49 UTC  

Who enforces the rules?

2018-11-15 17:39:48 UTC  

Im back

2018-11-15 17:40:25 UTC  

These arguments dont have any basis to them

2018-11-15 17:40:56 UTC  

It rests on it requires a lot of money to get in without defining why it takes that much

2018-11-15 17:41:09 UTC  

Saying that it happens without government

2018-11-15 17:42:07 UTC  
2018-11-15 17:42:52 UTC  

So google Monopoly happened with Gouvernment? How so?

2018-11-15 17:43:21 UTC  

and Microsoft?

2018-11-15 17:43:22 UTC  

They still have competitors

2018-11-15 17:43:31 UTC  

Same with Microsoft

2018-11-15 17:43:44 UTC  

Where's OS/2 then? Or BeOS?

2018-11-15 17:43:48 UTC  

Also they have both used law suits to their advantage

2018-11-15 17:44:08 UTC  

As for patents it should be based on Great Britain’s Copyright Act of 1911

2018-11-15 17:45:08 UTC  
2018-11-15 17:45:38 UTC  

Lets just say they didnt use government like I said competitors exist and its the value we put on them

2018-11-15 17:50:15 UTC  

These monopolies cant be maintained without force unless they offer enough to maintain it though

2018-11-15 17:50:43 UTC  

Also to violate their rights is a contradiction if you ever claim to defend peoples property rights

2018-11-15 17:51:02 UTC  

Government also does this as I said before

2018-11-15 17:51:24 UTC  

This also doesnt equate to billions to enter

2018-11-15 17:51:26 UTC  

Yes, the force they can use because there are no rules that nobody enforces.

2018-11-15 17:51:40 UTC  

No in a free market they couldnt

2018-11-15 17:51:53 UTC  

Aslong as no ones rights are violated

2018-11-15 17:52:09 UTC  

Yes, they could because there ain't no rules and nobody keeps them from not bribing other people to not use the Competition's stuff.

2018-11-15 17:52:15 UTC  

that's how M$ got their Monopoly

2018-11-15 17:52:35 UTC  

You really should read up on the history of IT Companys and what happened.

2018-11-15 17:52:43 UTC  

A man of integrity wouldnt be bribed

2018-11-15 17:52:56 UTC  

But this still is avoiding some of my other claims

2018-11-15 17:53:00 UTC  

Especially the biggest ones -> Intel and Microsoft.

2018-11-15 17:53:06 UTC  

you clrearly have not done that.