Message from @Existence is identity

Discord ID: 512683735901274122


2018-11-15 17:17:37 UTC  

Even actual criminals have a more objective set of laws

2018-11-15 17:18:07 UTC  

You're essentially advocating for "right of the strongest" and that every Company can abuse the power and do everything they can to get money out of the pocket of the people.

2018-11-15 17:18:42 UTC  

Like I said before all monopolies came from government or got dismantled with time

2018-11-15 17:18:58 UTC  

no

2018-11-15 17:19:18 UTC  

if there were no rules, there would have been no Compaq, Dell and co

2018-11-15 17:19:55 UTC  

Yes the rules being force and market separated until someones rights are violated

2018-11-15 17:20:01 UTC  

*are

2018-11-15 17:23:18 UTC  

Yes and now you need a market that's protected by Patents and needs billions of dollars to enter.

2018-11-15 17:24:01 UTC  

And the primary source can just bribe the manufacturers to not use other stuff than theirs....

2018-11-15 17:24:39 UTC  

So in short: you need the Rules and to enforce it, so that such things do not happen.

2018-11-15 17:27:43 UTC  

Wow, I'm in agreement with Stefan for the third time today and it's not even lunchtime. The end times are most certainly upon us. 🙀

2018-11-15 17:28:14 UTC  

Yeah, one of those Examples would be Microsoft ^^

2018-11-15 17:28:33 UTC  

And Google (Android)

2018-11-15 17:29:37 UTC  

So free market means that everyone plays to the same rules and doesn't abuse or misuse the power given by the market.

2018-11-15 17:31:23 UTC  

Now, after M$ left the Mobile Phone OS Market, Google was forced in the EU to charge money for Android.
M$ always charged for mobile Windows.

2018-11-15 17:31:49 UTC  

Who enforces the rules?

2018-11-15 17:39:48 UTC  

Im back

2018-11-15 17:40:25 UTC  

These arguments dont have any basis to them

2018-11-15 17:40:56 UTC  

It rests on it requires a lot of money to get in without defining why it takes that much

2018-11-15 17:41:09 UTC  

Saying that it happens without government

2018-11-15 17:42:07 UTC  
2018-11-15 17:42:52 UTC  

So google Monopoly happened with Gouvernment? How so?

2018-11-15 17:43:21 UTC  

and Microsoft?

2018-11-15 17:43:22 UTC  

They still have competitors

2018-11-15 17:43:31 UTC  

Same with Microsoft

2018-11-15 17:43:44 UTC  

Where's OS/2 then? Or BeOS?

2018-11-15 17:43:48 UTC  

Also they have both used law suits to their advantage

2018-11-15 17:44:08 UTC  

As for patents it should be based on Great Britain’s Copyright Act of 1911

2018-11-15 17:45:08 UTC  
2018-11-15 17:45:38 UTC  

Lets just say they didnt use government like I said competitors exist and its the value we put on them

2018-11-15 17:50:15 UTC  

These monopolies cant be maintained without force unless they offer enough to maintain it though

2018-11-15 17:50:43 UTC  

Also to violate their rights is a contradiction if you ever claim to defend peoples property rights

2018-11-15 17:51:02 UTC  

Government also does this as I said before

2018-11-15 17:51:24 UTC  

This also doesnt equate to billions to enter

2018-11-15 17:51:26 UTC  

Yes, the force they can use because there are no rules that nobody enforces.

2018-11-15 17:51:40 UTC  

No in a free market they couldnt

2018-11-15 17:51:53 UTC  

Aslong as no ones rights are violated

2018-11-15 17:52:09 UTC  

Yes, they could because there ain't no rules and nobody keeps them from not bribing other people to not use the Competition's stuff.

2018-11-15 17:52:15 UTC  

that's how M$ got their Monopoly

2018-11-15 17:52:35 UTC  

You really should read up on the history of IT Companys and what happened.

2018-11-15 17:52:43 UTC  

A man of integrity wouldnt be bribed