and buy homes

@The Meme Lord if you are white kindly stfu

@AETA

Why do you people want ethnostates?

>That biggest study is the Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study (MTRAS). According to Rushton
and Jensen, it is “also the only transracial adoption study [of IQ] that includes a longitudinal
follow-up” [3] (p. 256). For the study Sandra Scarr and colleagues located White Minnesotans who
had adopted non-White children, and recorded the IQs of the adopters and their children (including
the non-adopted White children). Scarr et al. measured the children’s IQs in two waves, one when the
children had a mean age of 7 and another when they had a mean age of 17.At both times the White
adoptees scored higher than the Black–Black adoptees, and the Black–White adoptees scored between
the White and the Black–Black adoptees [13,14].

Because ethnostates are epic

To kick the African Americans out

<:kek:538084230408830987>

You can’t deny the legacy of redlining for example which meant black people couldn’t buy homes or start businesses

GG @The Meme Lord, you just advanced to level 5!

They’re not epic at all

that literally shows that white adopted children scored higher

than black adopted children in white households

on average iq ofc at a youngish age but it was the biggest stud

y

smhmh

scroll down to the conclusion

Granted I could care less about the blacks

conclusion is irrelevant

it gives somewhat of an opinion

“The blacks”

its kind of subjective

Hey hey hey

Black people in general

this is data

That biggest study is the Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study (MTRAS). According to Rushton
and Jensen, it is “also the only transracial adoption study [of IQ] that includes a longitudinal
follow-up” [3] (p. 256). For the study Sandra Scarr and colleagues located White Minnesotans who
had adopted non-White children, and recorded the IQs of the adopters and their children (including
the non-adopted White children). Scarr et al. measured the children’s IQs in two waves, one when the
children had a mean age of 7 and another when they had a mean age of 17. At both times the White
adoptees scored higher than the Black–Black adoptees, and the Black–White adoptees scored between
the White and the Black–Black adoptees [13,14].

No it’s really relevant it’s the fucking authors who collected the data interpreting it

I could care less about most races

its not interpreted

lol

its fucking data

If you want to analyze the report in any way, you should look at the conclusion

You mean couldn’t?

At both times the White
adoptees scored higher than the Black–Black adoptees, and the Black–White adoptees scored between
the White and the Black–Black adoptees [13,14]

Nah

That’s just a common scientific standard

I could care less than I actually do

omg

i could care less abt the conclusion

The conclusion isn't the data