Bruh

Lol

Can someone explain the difference between social and common ownership of the means of production

Ping me if you can

You'd expect hate crime in a multi cultural society

Blacks are only here to give us a sort of idea of what we should strive not to be.

Therefore, in that aspect they are beneficial.

I'm trying jeet

Rns

Lol

This is paraphrased but trump basically said when Mexico bring their people over, they're not bringing their best but are bringing over people with a lot of issues I.e. criminals and rapists. That's not racist at all.

He's even implying there are decent Mexicans by saying "they're not bringing their best" this whole trump saying mexicans are rapists has been debunked time and time again yet people still want to bring it up lol

The man that coined the term 'gender role' forced two brothers to perform sexual acts btw

Unironic fascism lmao

In the flesh

Ultranationalism

Fascism isn't inherently bad actually. There's just a high chance of tyranny.

Authoritarianism = tyranny or corruption the majority of the time where humans are involved

Not really

I agree with that though

Communism will always be bad when applied nationwide

Communism and socialism aren't necessarily high taxes

They're defined by who controls the means of production

Higher taxes in the short run

What programs

All communism is is common ownership of the means of production there need not be a government

I don't agree with free healthcare

But it should be subsidised to make it affordable sure

Wdym communism and social programs dont go hand in hand

Neither does communism and taxation

Communism is simply common ownership of the means of production

I'm not a commie or a socialist btw

Yh I don't really mix Marxism with communism but I see where you are coming from

If we take Marxism as the standard form of communism then you are right

Women should be allowed to vote but their votes should count for half of a man's vote

True

Nothing wrong with that

Except

Porn is for degens

This kinda talk is allowed on this server?

😂😂😂😂😂

Wasnt no Russian mw2

I was like 9 when I played that mission

Australia

I'm strong

Float like a butterfly
Sting like a bee
It won't hurt
If she can't see

Ouch bro

UN = Based

-israeli spy

I was jk

UN = not based

Ew

Lol
Firstly, there are only 2 sexes. Intersex people are a combination of the two. Secondly sex is based on chromosomes. About 5 sexes wtf.
Thirdly asexual animals are those that can reproduce by themselves as in they have both female and male parts. Asexual humans are different; these are just people that aren't sexually active or attracted to anyone. Theres a difference between the two how are people this stupid.

Referring to everyone by the gender would be tedious considering there are so many lol. So we should just refer to everyone by their sexes.

Gender is fake news btw. We've always referred to people by their sex. A couple of SJWs made the claim that this isn't that case for some reason and then came the term" gender"

"Intersex is a general term used for a variety of conditions in which a person is born with a reproductive or sexual anatomy that doesn't seem to fit the typical definitions of female or male. For example, a person might be born appearing to be female on the outside, but having mostly male-typical anatomy on the inside."

So basically a combination of the two

Like I said

https://isna.org/faq/what_is_intersex/

It isn't downplaying anything. I used the term "basically" for a reason. To make it clear I was going to give it a juvenile definition. Of course it's more complicated than that.

But it is a combination of the two sexes

Not some random arbitrary sex

I don't need a source for this. Progressives claim when we call someone a man or woman we are referring to them as such based on what society considers a man or a woman. I say this is fake news. When some one was called as such it was because of their sex. Obviously now it's different.

Why would it make less sense to address someone by their sex instead of gender when gender is arbitrary

I'm assuming there are multiple arbitrary genders btw

I don't necessarily agree with that

But for the sake of this debate I will assume that lol

So you only believe in 2 genders?

So you believe in infinite genders then ok

Can you give me your definition of gender?

Ok do you think these "typical associations" make sense or are justified?

Such as girls playing with dolls

And such

So they should become women instead?

Why would they have severe discomfort with their gender?

The only understandable reason is because it they dont fit the attributes for that gender that society has decided

So you believe if a man doesnt fit the attributes that society considers to be 'manly' attributes, that justifies him becoming a woman?

Ok
But they aren't legitimately a woman

They just dont act as society would want them to

So in reality they are still a man

I'm perfectly fine with that

Lol
Man and woman are sexes

Wdym

The gender is fake news

There is no scientific basis around that word

There is around sex however

Nope

What is that

Is that american

How about this

Let's assume you're right

Then we should address individuals based on what 'gender category' they fit in regardless of what they want to be addressed as

So a womanly man is a woman

Whether he wants to be addressed as such or not

That's what would make the most sense in your world lol

I'm not an American

Gender dysphoria is legit

I'm not ignoring those people at all

Lol what are you on about