Message from @Trancezustand
Discord ID: 543983080810217473
So? Perfection is the enemy of good enough.
Once again, how do we fight without becoming them?
How to fight against SJWs without becoming an Anti-SJW, which is the mirror image?
find a cause that everyone on both sides can rally against
What good is being the same as the opposition but in a different color hat?
That doesn't solve anything, it just shifts the problem into a new color range
That's a false equivalence entirely.
For one thing, our side is much more ideologically diverse and much more likely to fragment as it goes too far.
You are trying to fight collectivist which is a near default state of humans.
We are tribal by nature.
Plus, we're arguing for the ability to dissent in the future, not just crush all other factions.
Which is why we need a new approach to the organization and fighting
And, I mean, Anti-SJWs are a problem, but the longer they stay completely isolated, the more extreme and difficult they become. And the easier time the SJWs have in punishing everyone else.
SJW is way to loaded of a term, I try not to use it , but I get what you are saying
It's perfect for the sjw to Anti-SJW comparison.
One sees racism/sexism everywhere, the other sees the progressive/feminist adjenda everywhere
But this is besides the point
and using that term only emboldens that grenade
Which there is no way around
This is a red herring, the question is what to do.
Well what the communists did was go underground, scapegoat others and install themselves in positions where they could alter public perception/thoughts/opinions
Media, Education, Academia, etc
Indeed. And how to do it without setting a precedent for more government control of private interactions
I think you're chasing way too much purity Grenade.
Plus, you're too skeptical of these things.
Pardon me if I don't like the idea of pushing the government into things when the problem is already centralized power.
Again thats not the suggestion
There is no suggestion
The point is to get the government out of a as many things as possible since it is an institution controlled by the enemy
that's a bit too far in black or white thinking for me to endorse blackhawk
the other option is to continue to ignore the larger strategic picture
Indeed, think of Google and the CA laws on Political discrimination.
to view ww2 not as a series of campaigns and logistics, but of battles and tactical decisions
if you do that I promise you, you will lose
No, Blackhawk. There's a tactical picture that matter and if you can't win on the battlefield the grandest of strategies doesn't matter.
The left pushed the political discrimination laws in CA, doesn't mean they aren't potentially useful to us.
And a law to the effect of "Banks will not close accounts on political affiliation" seems like it would do alot for this recent case too.
My larger argument is that the government is aside the point anyway.
Using problem laws against their proponents is a good wait to win support of the opposition to remove them. The trick is identifying a successful method of using them.
Then read rules for radicals and apply it universally