And most of all, a shift in the culture to be more expressive and more able and willing to fight.

No more of these "go woke go broke" excuses.

The communists created the problems we have today by the tactics they used to survive and they had the benefit of their opponents reaching too far too quickly

So? Perfection is the enemy of good enough.

Once again, how do we fight without becoming them?

How to fight against SJWs without becoming an Anti-SJW, which is the mirror image?

find a cause that everyone on both sides can rally against

What good is being the same as the opposition but in a different color hat?

That doesn't solve anything, it just shifts the problem into a new color range

That's a false equivalence entirely.

For one thing, our side is much more ideologically diverse and much more likely to fragment as it goes too far.

You are trying to fight collectivist which is a near default state of humans.

We are tribal by nature.

Plus, we're arguing for the ability to dissent in the future, not just crush all other factions.

Which is why we need a new approach to the organization and fighting

And, I mean, Anti-SJWs are a problem, but the longer they stay completely isolated, the more extreme and difficult they become. And the easier time the SJWs have in punishing everyone else.

SJW is way to loaded of a term, I try not to use it , but I get what you are saying

It's perfect for the sjw to Anti-SJW comparison.

One sees racism/sexism everywhere, the other sees the progressive/feminist adjenda everywhere

But this is besides the point

and using that term only emboldens that grenade

Which there is no way around

This is a red herring, the question is what to do.

^^^^^^^^^^

Well what the communists did was go underground, scapegoat others and install themselves in positions where they could alter public perception/thoughts/opinions

Media, Education, Academia, etc

Indeed. And how to do it without setting a precedent for more government control of private interactions

I think you're chasing way too much purity Grenade.

Plus, you're too skeptical of these things.

Pardon me if I don't like the idea of pushing the government into things when the problem is already centralized power.

Again thats not the suggestion

There is no suggestion

The point is to get the government out of a as many things as possible since it is an institution controlled by the enemy

that's a bit too far in black or white thinking for me to endorse blackhawk

the other option is to continue to ignore the larger strategic picture

Indeed, think of Google and the CA laws on Political discrimination.

to view ww2 not as a series of campaigns and logistics, but of battles and tactical decisions

if you do that I promise you, you will lose

No, Blackhawk. There's a tactical picture that matter and if you can't win on the battlefield the grandest of strategies doesn't matter.

The left pushed the political discrimination laws in CA, doesn't mean they aren't potentially useful to us.

And a law to the effect of "Banks will not close accounts on political affiliation" seems like it would do alot for this recent case too.