Message from @Dr.Wol
Discord ID: 405853380951408650
give me the consenteroli
these are more like festivals, merch and everything
I was going to go
BUT THEN I BECAME ROBERT "BOB" "GAS" KUDLA
and sold my soul for tradegeeners.co
Beans
It is literally never physically through the phone
Who is the genuine bird?
I'm very aware of that didn't you.
😮
Members of feminist punk group Pussy Riot seek asylum... in Sweden.
http://www.euronews.com/2018/01/24/two-pussy-riot-members-seek-asylum-in-sweden-
Hahhahah
"Pussy Riot - Straight Outta Vagina (feat. Desi Mo & Leikeli47)"
yes
is good
does tim have a forehead?
No, but he is mixed race
I am starting to think he's an alien in disguise, here to educate the humans before we doom ourselves
This vidya is sponsared by TRADEGEENERSAKKADEMEME
K concepts is most definitely not a financial planner, but for 199.99 a month I can tell you how to GET RICH QUICK with just TWO SIMPLE STEPS
🤔 🤔
lets hope so
The Doomsday clock ticked to two minutes to midnight, again. https://thebulletin.org/sites/default/files/2018%20Doomsday%20Clock%20Statement.pdf
'The doomsday clock' is one of the most absurd things I've ever seen
At best just a guesstimate made by a bunch of socialologists and political science. No one can say for sure what "one minute" means, this is the very defination of a measure being vague and subjective.
From reading the article most of their concerns are with nuclear war with North Korea, not as much as it was in 1953 with an actual "Doomsday" scenario. I don't think a conflict with NK will lead to a new world war or a "Doomsday", but will be catastrophic for the region. They also talk about the failures of demorascies to disinformation and misuse of information ..
I don't really care about the clock itself, i more like to read their reasoning behind it.. To agree or disagree with..
The suggestion that humanity is 'two minutes from midnight' when it comes to life as we know it is patently absurd and clearly a statement by people who's -job- it is to be as alarmist as possible.
Drop the alarmist rethoric basically, reason behind it is interesting and all.
But surely we were alot closer to nuke outs back then than now.
Closer to nukes being thrown, yes.
Closer to world-as-we-know-it ending full-arsenal nuclear exchanges?
We couldn't be -further- from such a thing.
the one good thing about globalism is that it's made war between US/NATO, Russia and China simply a concept of the past.
I mean, I doubt a nuke war would start off with the first salvo being the entire salvo
The economies are too intertwined with one-another to allow any kind of actual warfare to happen between the major power holders in the world.
We where closer to all out nuclear war back in the 1950s, but we still have the threat of "local" nuclear war between two or a few nations.