Message from @ping
Discord ID: 407326734715846656
nah, he means a reliable conclusion when he says "good science" he doesn't mean how much it matters to society
like traffic studies that reduce road deaths by 1% is still going to be good
oh yeah nah I dont mean societal benefits
but instead that its drawn from reliable experiments and data to draw an accurate conclusion
implementation of good science will probably, *usually*, result in good benefits
yeah but like
i can prove my brainfuck theories for decades and decades and waste countless hours of other people's time
so can anime
thats not a problem
if its scientifically proven, its still good
the issue is also my hypothesis can be so loose that it would always be a hit
then its a bad hypothesis 😛
youd get called on your shit immediately
like if someone makes a study they can make it "good science" by just making the hypothesis too loose
I mean, a loose hypothesis gives you loose results
loose hypotheses are thought up by many a "woke" person
lul
like when you do shrooms and look at space and go "bruh what if like, hold on"
"what if the stars are watching"
*hits blunt* is it called Sand because its between Sea and Land?
creationists saying we cant prove evolution is real because we don't have a time machine
but what about the Ohare airport ufo of 2007
gotta be timetravellers and/or underground aliens
bitch, we've proven evolution,
we've managed to cultivate bacteria that break down synthetics, synthetics didn't exist 200 years ago
😛
and i don't mean bitch as an attack, i meant it like hip-hop slang
BBC showed theres only one place bacteria wont live
yeah but that's micro evolution
uranus, HAAAA
at the bottom of the ocean theres a salt ocean
(playing devil's advocate)
you can't make a bacteria grow legs
its called twitch actually
oh and there are gaps in fossils that claim to prove evolution
yes, but it still proves evolution, to declare it as "you can just spout legs" is just as useless an argument as "okay, make god appear and do a silly dance"
they were probably just birth defects
and they cherry picked the fossils to prove the scientist narritive
and you can't prove god doesn't exist
checkmate, atheists
yes but the creationists are just like the modern progressive left
despite evidence to the contrary they'll still push their narrative forward