Message from @pukeblood
Discord ID: 407326025773613076
yes but thats what makes them sciences
getting a correlation wrong by 10% in sociology is usually not that big of a deal
yes, because its not following the scientific method
its following statistics
i mean you are using the scientific method to collect good data
you're using experiments to collect the data
experiments being methods of collecting your data
yep, good data and good experimentation lays credit to the correllation, no one will want to say its 100% truth, but can be confident nonetheless, thats good science
as in selection strategies and in the case of something fuzzy, a classification algorithm
@pukeblood i think we should define "good science" as something that has an actual use in society that offsets it's cost
well its hard to say if something is good if its, say, new
supporting hypothesis are needed to make a theorem in any science
nah, he means a reliable conclusion when he says "good science" he doesn't mean how much it matters to society
like traffic studies that reduce road deaths by 1% is still going to be good
oh yeah nah I dont mean societal benefits
but instead that its drawn from reliable experiments and data to draw an accurate conclusion
implementation of good science will probably, *usually*, result in good benefits
yeah but like
i can prove my brainfuck theories for decades and decades and waste countless hours of other people's time
so can anime
if its scientifically proven, its still good
the issue is also my hypothesis can be so loose that it would always be a hit
then its a bad hypothesis 😛
youd get called on your shit immediately
like if someone makes a study they can make it "good science" by just making the hypothesis too loose
I mean, a loose hypothesis gives you loose results
loose hypotheses are thought up by many a "woke" person
lul
like when you do shrooms and look at space and go "bruh what if like, hold on"
"what if the stars are watching"
*hits blunt* is it called Sand because its between Sea and Land?
reminds me of another thing to bitch about
creationists saying we cant prove evolution is real because we don't have a time machine
but what about the Ohare airport ufo of 2007
gotta be timetravellers and/or underground aliens
bitch, we've proven evolution,
we've managed to cultivate bacteria that break down synthetics, synthetics didn't exist 200 years ago
😛
and i don't mean bitch as an attack, i meant it like hip-hop slang
BBC showed theres only one place bacteria wont live
yeah but that's micro evolution