Message from @I AM ERROR
Discord ID: 414189698978938883
pretty much like every single person does, no one votes for what they believe is bad for them
for example: i personally do not think that civilians should be allowed to own guns (with VERY specific exceptions). but if i look at the US it obvious that it is impossible to get rid of all the guns (especially the illegal ones) which makes the risk of a ban outweigh the reward.
Pew Pew Bang Bang.
On Christmas, I received my permit (because the state regulates firearms excessively). :3
SHALL NOT, etc.
Next month, I attend a safety-course!
what state?
The United States' most gerrymandered one.
Maryland?
👍🏽
The 2nd & 4th Districts appear awkward, but the 3rd proves comical.
gun regulation in germany: only for police, military, hunters (hunting rifles only) and security personnel...
So it goes.
There exist more private security officers than police in the United States.
and most of the police in the US would probably not be able to become police officers in germany...
Why?
Simply incorrect, about german gunlegislation
They could.
Issue is the typical german police officer has been in training for about three years before finally becoming an officer? Whereas in the US the typical training time is about six months.
There's a fuckton more people that own guns in Germany than just those groups.
It's simply not correct that there's no such thing as recreational gun ownership in Germany.
yeah, 3 years training and physical and mental tests to before you can even begin training
One professor from Germany stated there exists a "right to technology" in Germany that grants arriving refugees iPhones, though he specialized in economics so that may prove unreliable.
Nope.
Sure as fuck not what I've heard from German gun owners.
right to technology...?
3 years was police 😉
You meant that "Nope" for me, or Falko?
I think that should be obvious.
Me, then.
...No
"Common sense is not so common." 🤷🏽
It seems obvious to me that a right *to* technology (esp. an iPhone) seems ridiculous. :/
In terms of being available for purchase, sure, but not for it to just be handed to you. And even then, that should have some limitations.
Obviously, private citizens shouldn't be allowed to purchase nuclear weapons.
Yes, availability & ability to purchase one make sense.
(I apologize; English is not my first language.)
recreational gun ownership is the same as "hunter" for me... basically the same regulations for both