thats odd

however

I cant prove it and wont claim it was deliberate

yeah

is it not just propaganda?

propaganda generally needs to be intentional

otherwise it's (mis|dis)info

well, disinfo would be intentional too

ok, meetings

Shill the discord!

I noticed the original image seemed a little dark over all, is it possible someone in the editing room just used a program to lighten the whole thing and it had ended up changing the eye color?

my mom told me wen I was young never trust the news collect information and make up your own mind.

http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2018/04/dutch-hospital-challenges-big-pharma-by-making-own-version-of-very-pricey-drug/

ZOOM IN ON CAT

So, it seems Deerfield, Illinois has now officially banned "assault weapons."

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Deerfield%2C+Illinois+assault+weapons&t=ffab&ia=news

I'm linking the duckduckgo search instead of listing all of the sources, but all of the big names are reporting on it: cnn, washington times, chicago tribune, cbs news, etc.

It looks like any weapon carrying more than 10 rounds.

Including pistols.

"Trustees voted unanimously."

And people who own a gun classified as an 'assault weapon' are going to be forced to turn it in or risk a pretty hefty fine.

They're going to be dragged in front of the court, because it's simply unconstitutional.

If I owned a gun there I'd look into moving and if they tried to fine me before I moved, look at taking them to court for not giving sufficient time to leave the town with my lawfully owned weapon.

hopefully it gives the other states more legal fodder

A real gun friendly state should look at classifing any legal gun holder in their state as part of the "state militia" so they can say any federal law trying to restrict their ownership as actually unconstitutional.

Nice.

I like that idea.

Meanwhile, didn't Texas just allow for open-carrying *swords?*

I mean, why not? Lmao

Funny how most "gun nuts" respond to haters by either inviting them over to a shooting range, or simply ignoring them.

Well, not sure if thats all of them. But seems to be the experience on the gun reddits.

Kinda why I dont trust weapon registers, I support registering to own them like they have CCW permits, but I dont like the sound of the company selling the gun keeping records on who bought what. Or at least keeping them but forced to turn them over to the govt or face punishment.

why would a company not keep records of their customers?

They could and should. Its the idea of the govt forcing them to give them over.

i mean, lets face it, the government could probably find out who owns guns and what kinds if they really wanted to even without company records

Okay, assume thats true then. Good luck actually taking them.

they can take them. the question really is at what cost do they consider it worth while

actually, the ATF is expressly forbidden of creating an owner registry

that doesn't stop the states from doing it and then making it available though

however tech has come pretty far

and I suspect at least half of the AR-15 owners also own an 80% lower (Completed or not)