Message from @buffaloguy1991
Discord ID: 433103167954223105
that is if you take war as only an issue,
War forces quick adaptation and evolution of combat,
WW2 was amazing for innovating technology, in fact the first electronic analog computer was a product of this
not to mention that after a war which ends in stability, the economy booms because all the old wares were destroyed, allowing a fresh new generation of equipment to be built and directly implemented
Kind of like bacteria and anti-biotics in a way,
the bacteria either adapts and becomes resistant, and this resistant strain makes the old anti-biotics useless.
Or the bacteria dies off
and if it survives, its stronger than before, because the weakness has been removed
economies don't boom in the countries devastated. Unless you are not taking the massive decline in the economies during the war.
thats why i said, in wars that end with stability, like the west in WW2
@Timcast https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/830148525853396992 i don't know if you get notifications of people @ ing you on minds, so i figure id share it here as well just to be sure. i just watched the culture war podcast, and this post of mine on minds provides some sources to stuff that went down during #gamergate, since you asked for it
so he's partying with Saddam in heaven now? if southpark is accurate
@Timcast hey i made this comment on your video today and i thought it might help to have it here too "there's something actually semi-misleading about how you've presented the result of your test here tim, while i think its a good experiment, its results arnt as clear cut and definitive as you present them considering you haven't shown the videos you claim to have had your advertisement put on for the following reason. you put on content filters, however not all category of content filters will filter out all videos if completely checked for every sub filter. only the filters under group "digital content labels" are applied to all content on the platform, those under "sensitive content" do not as some videos wont be covered under the filters of anything under "sensitive content". basically you forgot to do a control with every filter under "sensitive content" checked when you ran your ad, even then you probably didn't get your ad on every video on youtube, as such even if you did do a control, then did a "sexually suggestive" and "sensational and shocking" filter test there's no guarantee you could tell that you had more results from the latter 2 by simply looking at the numbers"
Just remembered. I gotta call Tim out on something he and others like H3H3 kinda messed up.
Alright you know the whole creepy kids show debacle from a few months ago. Well I think there was an innocent channel caught in the cross-fire.
Do you remember the channel "Hey Kids"?
It was an ARG. Unfortunately key-word there is was.
If someone @ 's me I'll provide evidence of it being an ARG.
@buffaloguy1991 I think whether it was an ARG or not doesn't play into the meat of the criticism. The fact that it was still content that was being directed at children by Youtube would be problematic, itself, depending on the content.
but it wasn't (I don't t think so) here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8B1sRPwK248
Granted, if there was effort being put into it as an ARG, it shouldn't fall in the same category as the algorithm-bait channels.
NIghtmind covers channels like this.
But yeah there were ALOT of channels that were offending. All I'm saying is "Hey Kids" was not one of the offenders.
A lot of the blame falls on Google, though
Sure, I suppose you could say that the channels were offending
but in the end, they were creating content that got views, letting them make money off of ads
It's the algorithm that was the offender.
Machines are still too stupid to handle anything as massive as Youtube.
Part of the point, really.
But, I mean
they're able to set up algorithms that can demonetize a video before it's even fully uploaded
Co-incidently was the point of the sub-narrative of "Hey Kids" an AI trying to make a kids show and failing.
so, if they're able to do that, categorizing a video as potentially troubling shouldn't be too much of a problem, right?
I don't think I'm anywere near ready to trust the machines yet
Just watch in 2 months all cat videos are gonna be slammed for sexual content cause the AI has the IQ of a lobotomite.
is....is that what I think it is?
A positive and accurate article related to gaming on a news website....ON FORBES?!!?! I thought it was just a legend.
@everyone
People are joining our official America First's 4chan thread
http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/167509162
"it will just turn into a proxy war guys" https://twitter.com/Charles_Lister/status/983720452412575744
https://twitter.com/Partisangirl/status/983683054815272961?s=19
great, more refoogees
Shill your cupcakes
you know i actually kind of agree with that article from tim's video today. just that i dont agree with the prediction from it. that person writing that article might be the most woke person on the left alive right now if they actually recognize the polarization of the country and the subgroups of people who make up both sides of the conflict. though i disagree that a war is nessicary to deal with this though it is the american way. i think most people would actually prefer a segragation between the ideologically incompatible sides within the nation. the left isint going to win a civil war though, they won the first one because they had the advantage, it was really only a matter of time and their own incompatence mixed with the tanacity of the right at the time lead to it being drawn out far longer than nessicary in asymetrical warfare. the left rose to power during the great depression because they could offer answers to peoples needs to get things done that no one else could. FDR was basicly the american hitler, or lenon, or mussalini (ever think about how many regime changes occured during the great depression?) and trump is kind of the 21st century's FDR as a populerist.
its kinda delussional to think that the us is becoming more left, not many people are saying that and at the same time winners usually dont call for less cooperation with the loser, they usually dont see that being nessicary consitering it makes them look bad
The dems are winning in so far as there has not been that many good candidates for those oppose to the left to really rally behind.