•Symbiotic Demographic Warfare (SDW), where the DC benefit the HC, without integrating (And therefore maintaining their national and ethnic identity).

SDW is especially effective with modern, secular and liberal democracies as it is less obvious and it's less unlikely that ethnic tension will be present between the DCs and the natives of the HC.

It also works best if an extensive welfare state is implemented, as it will increase the dependence on the DC of the HC.

The main problem of SDW is that increases the strenght and resources of the HC, which might make a counter-attack, if the plan is discovered.

•Parasitic Demographic Warfare (PDW), where the DC drain the HC economy and resources.

Useful to damage the economy of the HC, especially if the HC has a large welfare state and is non-discriminatory.

The PDW's problem is that it's much more obvious and that ethnic tension between the natives and the DC is almost assured.

It can be especially good for poor countries, as the harmful immigration of the DC can be justified as an humanitarian crysis.

HC = Host Country

DC = Demographic Changers

Where is this from?

A from a post I made a while ago on an other server.

I Just took a bigger portion of it instead of Just the definitions.

In my opinion it can easily have different forms.

Immigration can either be positive or harm.

Some countries like Canada are economically dependant in immigration.

So if other European groups aren't important to you, what about Swiss-Italians? And if other groups racially similar, like other Europeans, why are Italians so different, if not viewed from the lens of the state? It seems that what is only important to you is the piece of paper that says someone is "Italian", and the Italian people are now being used as a tool of the hive like collective state to ever expand to meet it's materialistic needs, the state has very much become a consuming unfeeling machine.

Canada does not have to be dependant on immigration... use your brain

The state should be the regulator and director of the people.

Says you

It must do what is necessary to increase the collective's power.

Power is numbers, productivity, resources...

What is the argument that the state should regulate and direct people?

Well, don't you think that the state should punish people for stealing ?

It's not necessary, people, families and communities can do that, like they have for a long time.

Laws are regulations and the state its the enforcer of the law.

A family still needs to do similar things to become powerful.

Police weren't necessary in Northern Europe until the industrial revolution and the poor started breeding without starving

Men would kill vigilante style in the night, and no one cared because everyone knew they were criminals

If you have a healthy, high trust populace like that, you don't need police, you don't need state expansion

The state doesn't have to expand like your nightmare state, we know through history that we can do otherwise, the problem is self improvement, not expanding a gross Empire

Without the state the people are more subjectable to foreign and internal subversive activities.

The state must be the main cultural influencer.

People make culture...

Also

The state can absolutely influence culture. North Korea is a good example of that.

GG @Deleted User, you just advanced to level 6!

The statesman responsible for fabricating culture are in a perfect position to be subverted and thus work against the people. Just like in Democracies, politician scum tier people are bought out and work for their buyers. The state offers the best means to subvert a people. What could a foreign state do to a people who aren't glued to a state tv to get their culture?

Why would someone like a dictator accept submission in the territory it holds ? His power is directly proportional to that of the state and collective.

The more powerful the nation becomes, the more he/She is powerful.

The more he/she is likely to be assassinated and taken over with their own ideas

Once that position breaks down the entire "collective" might be doomed

A single person

But you always assume the state leader will be all knowing and thoughtful of the collective

No way, every single international power will be trying to jew you out of power

I need to go now. We will continue the discussion later.

yo