Message from @>Cytos, de lieve goede synth
Discord ID: 443892454337282058
and you will find blue eyed people likely will only matter as much as they are common in white races, and not in african or asian races
say that every time the blue eyed people score lower than brown eyed people by a noticable margin?
its alsmost like things like eye colour can be because of genes, but intelligence is somehow not important or all equal
heres the thing Wacka, if you test them for all that, and the results keep changing with different values on top,
You have PROVEN that they don't have an impact
say I win on black at the roulette table 10 times in a row .. so what? what do you know now?
are you going to pick black now? .. its still 50 50
we dont do 10 times my dide
thats gambling with RNG
think.. 100.000's
and on that avergate you will find 50/50
especially for something as easy to trial as roulette
look Wacka, if you test all people for a difference in Race to IQ ratio, and the races who come out "better" keep changing, you've DISPROVEN that race has a difference in IQ
if however it shows a clear difference, you have instead proven it
that there is a difference
but that does happen ... pretty sure that happens
like in some groups black people will have higher IQs than white people ...
unless you are actually claiming that every test with 10 or more people thats been conducted has always shown one result
no, i'm claiming, that if we were to test the entire world with the same IQ test, and you rate them by race to IQ ratio,
the result is relevant, because if say on average black people score 20 points lower, you have then proven that in current humanity, black people are on AVERAGE lower of IQ
if that is NOT the case, and on average they are the same
you have then pissed off the alt-right, AND proven there is no relation
but you will never get a same average
you don't have to
that would be crazy to have a same average
you dont have to have the exact same average
but if there is a clear gap in average values, with some race clearly coming out on top every single time
you can draw a conclusion
Im pretty sure its not always one group on top
asians or jews on top
usually depends if they even test jews as a seperate group, or as part of the nation they reside in
well we never tested all of humanity, so we can't say for sure
when you get a large enough sample, it can be said to be representative
i disagree that that is always the case
however we can clearly say that the average african is dragged down substantionally due to Africa being far behind in educational support for its people
you cant always determine some things... no matter how big the sample is
you can actually
sample sizes merely refine the numbers
I learnt this trying to work out random binary compression techniques back in college
It's always been based on culture and region, hasn't it?
yes
and education